MSDNC exists, so why shouldn't RT?

BBC exists, CBC exists, NPR, PBS, Australian public broadcasting, so on, so forth.

I'm sure the great savior of democracy, Kamala Harris - who I'm definitely voting for, would never want to ban Instituto Mexicano de la Radio.

It's already known that the organizations listed above are foreign sponsored and paying pundits for their opinion. There's no way to tell their intentions toward the U.S. nor how much (or little) influence they have. We only know they're looking out for themselves.

Fox News being right wing oriented is one thing.

a foreign power paying influencers to promote its interests here is another.

we cannot allow a foreign network to openly corrupt our political system any more

Therefore, these answers are inconsistent with the facts. IOW... if we can't allow RT to exist then we should also go after Imevisión.

In order to help draw the contest to a close, the judges suggest I rephrase the question:

Why is Garland and the DOJ going after a seemingly random state sponsored media organization instead of lounging on teh beach like supreme leader Biden?
 
It's already known that the organizations listed above are foreign sponsored and paying pundits for their opinion. There's no way to tell their intentions toward the U.S. nor how much (or little) influence they have. We only know they're looking out for themselves.





Therefore, these answers are inconsistent with the facts. IOW... if we can't allow RT to exist then we should also go after Imevisión.

In order to help draw the contest to a close, the judges suggest I rephrase the question:

Why is Garland and the DOJ going after a seemingly random state sponsored media organization instead of lounging on teh beach like supreme leader Biden?

Evidence that NPR and PBS are funded by foreign sources, please.
 
Evidence that NPR and PBS are funded by foreign sources, please.

The judges caution that your disqualification for nitpicking is currently under review.

In addition, those organizations have taken donations from many unknown actors.
 
FB_IMG_1725831628530.jpg


They prey on people who struggle with weighting things. Anything that seems like anything else is pretty much the same and the mark is incapacitated. Russia propoganda 101.

But what about.
You're no better than meeeeeee....!
I do my own research.
Don't judge the source, discuss the topic! bla bla.
 
Last edited:
The judges caution that your disqualification for nitpicking is currently under review.

In addition, those organizations have taken donations from many unknown actors.

you made the list to characterize that foreign influence is rampant. Disputing that list is not nitpicking, it’s attacking your core argument
 
Why is Garland and the DOJ going after a seemingly random state sponsored media organization instead of lounging on teh beach like supreme leader Biden?

Don't hate the player, hate the game.

The judges note that the audience is starting to sound like a spoiled child.
 
Back
Top