More Racist Violence...uh, the Politically-Incorrect Kind

jsp326 said:
Obviously I'm showing the double-standards of the MSM. Black-on-white crime isn't "racist." Instead, we get excuses, tripe about "black plight," etc. We've had Vietnamese people come here in the 1970s, penniless and sometimes facing racism, and they built businesses and sent their kids through college and med schools.

There's been slavery and injustice on every continent. Blaming multiple generations of high crime and government dependence on something that happened 150-250 years ago shouldn't cut it. And no, I'm not lumping all blacks together. I'm talking about the ones (and their modern white, liberal plantation owners) who take no responsibility for the problems in their culture.

I appreciate your response, though. It's a great example of "squirming, tap dancing and refusing to engage with real issues," as I mentioned earlier. It was completely vapid, and sounds like you've been brainwashed by a bunch of "Diversity and Multicultural Studies" garbage in college or on "progressive" websites. Maybe you even have a government or academic job where taxpayers fund you to write such drivel.
More...

What is with race-baiters?

They create posts with racism being the hallmark calling. When someone actually joins the conversation, and asks a couple of simple questions, trying to get to the heart of what the post is all about- they call it "evasive tap dancing".

If I were to agree with the post's theme, going on and on about the problems blacks have in their culture, and blaming whites who want to give them money, and breaks- Would this satisfy your lust to convert me into a republican?

You are somehow allowed to post threads referring to blacks beating up a white as a racist crime.

If I were to post a thread, showing opposite circumstances, and called it a racist crime- you and the rest of the rightwing doberman's would be biting through my "liberal" jugulars.

I have no problem talking about whatever problem you are having with the media, the blacks, and the left- but please don't call it tap dancing, when it's more like vaudeville.
 
Hoofhearted said:
What is with race-baiters?

They create posts with racism being the hallmark calling. When someone actually joins the conversation, and asks a couple of simple questions, trying to get to the heart of what the post is all about- they call it "evasive tap dancing".

If I were to agree with the post's theme, going on and on about the problems blacks have in their culture, and blaming whites who want to give them money, and breaks- Would this satisfy your lust to convert me into a republican?

You are somehow allowed to post threads referring to blacks beating up a white as a racist crime.

If I were to post a thread, showing opposite circumstances, and called it a racist crime- you and the rest of the rightwing doberman's would be biting through my "liberal" jugulars.

I have no problem talking about whatever problem you are having with the media, the blacks, and the left- but please don't call it tap dancing, when it's more like vaudeville.
More...

A couple of people have wondered why I haven't posted to this thread. I didn't post to this thread initially because (a) the report to which the OP linked didn't say what he said it said (or at least he assigned meanings to it that came with his baggage) and (b) there is a fundamental inconsistency in the first sentence that no one has as yet addressed (though someone may have and I just missed it). One did not, therefore, have to be clairvoyant in order to see where it all was most likely to go. And it has. So why add fuel to the fire?

No one is looking to actually discuss it. They are rather looking for confirmation of whatever they think is the issue, underlying or not. For that, it isn't necessary to post anything at all since it would not likely even be read.

As you were.
 
I disagree. The report said or showed exactly what he said. A mob descended on a store and beat people. Apparently they also beat other people in the mall. If a group of whites went out and attacked blacks for no reason, you know as well as i do it would be front page news, every newscast and cable channel would lead with it and the Justice Department would be there the next day.
 
achilles28 said:
What is it with Liberals and their obsession with being 'smart'? The common denominator to every post you and buttboy make is, 'im smart and you're stupid'. Buddy, suck a fucking dick, you stupid bitch. IS that clear enough for you?
More...


I repeat .. you cannot read and comprehend.

I am NOT a liberal and never have been. If you actually read my posts and have the IQ to comprehend them you'd know that. I love your rant here ... shows you to be a mental midget.
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
I disagree. The report said or showed exactly what he said. A mob descended on a store and beat people. Apparently they also beat other people in the mall. If a group of whites went out and attacked blacks for no reason, you know as well as i do it would be front page news, every newscast and cable channel would lead with it and the Justice Department would be there the next day.
More...

You may want to read it again, all the way to the end.
 
Hoofhearted said:
What is with race-baiters?

They create posts with racism being the hallmark calling. When someone actually joins the conversation, and asks a couple of simple questions, trying to get to the heart of what the post is all about- they call it "evasive tap dancing".

If I were to agree with the post's theme, going on and on about the problems blacks have in their culture, and blaming whites who want to give them money, and breaks- Would this satisfy your lust to convert me into a republican?

You are somehow allowed to post threads referring to blacks beating up a white as a racist crime.

If I were to post a thread, showing opposite circumstances, and called it a racist crime- you and the rest of the rightwing doberman's would be biting through my "liberal" jugulars.

I have no problem talking about whatever problem you are having with the media, the blacks, and the left- but please don't call it tap dancing, when it's more like vaudeville.
More...

1) You still didn't engage with any issues. Yes, you again tried to tap-dance and sliver around the issues. Anyone with a functioning brain knows that whenever an alleged white-on-black incident happens, the MSM is all over it--Trayvon, Ferguson, Duke lacrosse, pretty much every event/hoax that Sharpton has been involved with. When much more common black-on-white crimes occur, only a few conservative publications cover them. If there were an ounce of consistency or honesty in Sharpton/Jackson/Obama/Holder/you, they would denounce these crimes right away.

2) " Would this satisfy your lust to convert me into a republican?" When did I try to convert anyone into being a Republican? Another ASSumption and hidden motive you're trying to impugn to me. I voted for the Libertarian candidate in the last election.

3) "You are somehow allowed to post threads referring to blacks beating up a white as a racist crime." Oh, the inhumanity! I guess I should be banned. It doesn't fit your narrative or worldview, so it must not be true. Yet you have no problem with white-on-black incidents being reported as such.

4) "I have no problem talking about whatever problem you are having with the media, the blacks, and the left- but please don't call it tap dancing, when it's more like vaudeville." Then drop the PC gibberish, distractions, misdirection, etc.. Man up, grow a pair and start talking about them, cupcake. (Yes, I probably just offended your beta male, feminine side, too, eh? Get over it already.)

That's all for now. Unlike some here, I have real work to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top