Money Management

Quote from NihabaAshi:

:D :D :p :D :D

Humpty Bumpty fell on a thread

Humpty Bumpty now left for dead

All who care about losses and risk

Have nay to say about what's already been said



Boo hooo hooo hoooo

:(
 
Quote from ES335:

Cnms,

I've read this thread and the rest of ET on the topic, and I don't think that the issue of trading FREQUENCY has ever been addressed. Sure enough, people have talked about keeping the max number of positions opened to not exceed 5-6% or whatever arbitrary level, and that's helpful I'm sure. However, what about intraday traders who only trade 1 trade at a time?

Let's say you choose to risk R per trade, where R = x % of your capital C, say 0.5%* C or 0.05C. If you trade 1 trade setup at a time, on average 4 times a day, would that be equivalent to the swing trader who is risking no more than 2% per trade in his trading?

How can one incorporate trading frequency into that helpful but overly simplistic heuristic of 2% of capital per trade that Van Tharp advocates?


I agree even if a small risk is taken per trade risk is meaningless without limiting the # of trades.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=902372#post902372
 
Dr. Alexander Elder writes in his "Come Into My Trading Room":
  • Whenever the value of your account dips 6% below its closing value at the end of last month, stop trading for the rest of this month. Calculate your equity each day, including cash, cash equivalents, and current market value of all open positions in your account. Stop trading as soon as your equity dips 6% below where it stood on the last day of the previous month. Close all positions that may still be open and spend the rest of that month on the sidelines. Continue to monitor the markets, keep track of your favorite stocks and indicators, and paper trade if you wish. Review your trading system. Was this losing streak just a fluke or did it expose a flaw in your system?
I think this is a good advice. A significant loss (6% or whatever your limit) should automatically trigger a cool down (till then end of the month or of the week or however much it takes you) and a review.
Quote from OddTrader:

Don't we usually define a MaxDailyLossLimit before starting a day? :confused:
 
es335,

the 1% (or 2%) is a simple form of diversification of the 5% (or 6%) risk. The 5% is a rule of thumb, but if you have a well defined system that you traded long enough to have some statistical data the best way is to do your own calculation.

With your win/loss ratio and average win / average loss ratio you calculate your Kelly ratio. This tells you what is the percentage of your trading account that you should bet to have it grow at its maximum possible rate. Using this number may cause you large drawdowns that you may not be willing to go through. For this reason (as demonstrated in one paper I referenced before), you can use a 1/5 or 1/6 of your Kelly ratio, with more than 90% chance of not having a drawdown larger than 20%, and about 100% chance of not getting halved.

If your Kelly is 30%, then 1/5 or 1/6 of it will give you the 6% or 5% recommended by many authors without any demonstration.

Obviously betting less than the optimal Kelly percentage will reduce the slope of your equity curve, but you'll feel safer. On the other hand if you trust yourself and your trading system, you can take more risk and in the long run you should see better returns.

I agree with your suggestion to see the risk diversification not only vertically on the positions that you have opened at the same time, but also horizontally as positions opened successively.
Quote from ES335:

Cnms,

I've read this thread and the rest of ET on the topic, and I don't think that the issue of trading FREQUENCY has ever been addressed. Sure enough, people have talked about keeping the max number of positions opened to not exceed 5-6% or whatever arbitrary level, and that's helpful I'm sure. However, what about intraday traders who only trade 1 trade at a time?

Let's say you choose to risk R per trade, where R = x % of your capital C, say 0.5%* C or 0.05C. If you trade 1 trade setup at a time, on average 4 times a day, would that be equivalent to the swing trader who is risking no more than 2% per trade in his trading?

How can one incorporate trading frequency into that helpful but overly simplistic heuristic of 2% of capital per trade that Van Tharp advocates?
 
Quote from cnms2:
I agree with your suggestion to see the risk diversification not only vertically on the positions that you have opened at the same time, but also horizontally as positions opened successively. [/B]

A practical example, please? Thanks.
 
Quote from cnms2:
I agree with your suggestion to see the risk diversification not only vertically on the positions that you have opened at the same time, but also horizontally as positions opened successively. [/B]

A practical example, please? Thanks.
 
On another thread macy posted:
  • "...I am 70-80 percent accurate in my trades, and my losses are limited to about 1%. ... my winnings are usually 2 percent...."
Plugging his data into Kelly's formula (win/loss = 2, with 75% probability) we get k=0.625. So 62.5% of the account is the bet that would increase it at the maximum rate. 1/5 Kelly is 12.5%, so this would be the maximum risk you should take (as demonstrated in one paper I referenced before), to have only 4% probability of a 30% drawdown.

You can further reduce your risk exposure through diversification, and this can be done by opening i.e. 5 positions in 5 different assets, risking on each only 2.5%.

If you're an active trader it may be more difficult to track several positions at the same time, so you may consider horizontal (sequential) diversification. You have to decide on what time frame are you willing to risk the 12.5%. If this is one week, and you make about 10 trades / week, you should risk 1.25% per position.

If you had a a bad streak and your account is down 12.5% you should take a break, should review how it happen, and restart trading only after you cooled down.

Using a fractional Kelly reduces your risk, but at the same time it substantially slows your equity curve slope too. :(

After only 8 trades (2 losses, 6 wins):
Code:
     Risk     Drawdown      Profit
     -----------------------------
        1%        2%           10%
     12.5%       24%          190%
     62.5%       86%         1700%
Compounding is truly amazing!


  • Quote from cnms2:
    I agree with your suggestion to see the risk diversification not only vertically on the positions that you have opened at the same time, but also horizontally as positions opened successively.
Quote from Bernard111:
A practical example, please? Thanks.
 
Back
Top