On another
thread macy posted:
- "...I am 70-80 percent accurate in my trades, and my losses are limited to about 1%. ... my winnings are usually 2 percent...."
Plugging his data into Kelly's formula (win/loss = 2, with 75% probability) we get k=0.625. So 62.5% of the account is the bet that would increase it at the maximum rate. 1/5 Kelly is 12.5%, so this would be the maximum risk you should take (as demonstrated in one
paper I referenced before), to have only 4% probability of a 30% drawdown.
You can further reduce your risk exposure through diversification, and this can be done by opening i.e. 5 positions in 5 different assets, risking on each only 2.5%.
If you're an active trader it may be more difficult to track several positions at the same time, so you may consider
horizontal (sequential) diversification. You have to decide on what time frame are you willing to risk the 12.5%. If this is one week, and you make about 10 trades / week, you should risk 1.25% per position.
If you had a a bad streak and your account is down 12.5% you should take a break, should review how it happen, and restart trading only after you cooled down.
Using a fractional Kelly reduces your risk, but at the same time it substantially slows your equity curve slope too.
After only 8 trades (2 losses, 6 wins):
Code:
Risk Drawdown Profit
-----------------------------
1% 2% 10%
12.5% 24% 190%
62.5% 86% 1700%
Compounding is truly amazing!
- Quote from cnms2:
I agree with your suggestion to see the risk diversification not only vertically on the positions that you have opened at the same time, but also horizontally as positions opened successively.
Quote from Bernard111:
A practical example, please? Thanks.