Money Management Question

Hi all, I have a question about money management.

Jordan Belfort once said in a podcast that money managers who can produce a consistent 25%+ monthly return can make a lot of money in this business. Not only do they have a high return, but they also can command a higher performance fee and management fee from their investors.

Is it absolutely necessary to make 25% a month in order to make money as a money manager?

What if a trader makes 100% a year? Is that still considered top performance?

Thanks

In todays world 25% ROR is the bare minimum with decent access, in the 90’s during “wolf of Wall Street” days I’m sure a few guys were doing well above 25% with ease but in this digital era you’ll make 25% just in spread rebates with the right infrastructure.

but on the other hand 100% with no access at face value is definitely good, but it’ll be hard to push that management fee.

Because 25% ROR monthly is easy to come by with access, or someone clever will get that same monthly 25 by scheming 770 accounts. But to be clear 100% yearly interest is great but in this sport top performance numbers is 10x that 100 at the bare minimum
 
Hi all, I have a question about money management.

Jordan Belfort once said in a podcast that money managers who can produce a consistent 25%+ monthly return can make a lot of money in this business. Not only do they have a high return, but they also can command a higher performance fee and management fee from their investors.

Is it absolutely necessary to make 25% a month in order to make money as a money manager?

What if a trader makes 100% a year? Is that still considered top performance?

Thanks
images
images




If the money manager can consistently make 5% a month, that is very good.

Beyond that, we have to invest in Madoff.
 
Last edited:
Annual return of 12% is nothing. Nasdaq's annual return is lot higher than that. Even the S&P 500 has returned 20+% in 2021. What's different is that Madoff's return is 10% EVERY SINGLE YEAR with no down years. That's what made it "interesting".
%%
HE did much better than that;
if you count some of his ''feeder funds'' /curiously steady 13.5-19%:D:D
Easy to discern crypto c*ns like S Bankman Fried.But Mr Madoff had a likable personality like Col Sanders of KY Fried.
And his market makers gave plenty of people good fills on NQ, especially considering the trends LOL:caution::caution:Former chair of NQ;
and one of the first kings of PFOF.
 
images
images




If the money manager can consistently make 5% a month, that is very good.

Beyond that, we have to invest in Madoff.

What madoff did 10 years ago, today American and Western European wealth managers and politicians call it “diversification”, “cycles” “put options” ”hedging” “private credit” “market makers” lol
 
Last edited:
Back
Top