Miss California Assailed By Gays For Defending Marriage

Quote from WTL:

Can't two common law spouses just sign a contract between them stating joint ownership of assets?

Yes, you are correct. Even today all this can be done via contract.

The Gays have a different agenda. First they hijack words from the language like Gay and Rainbow. Now they want to steal the word marriage.

They want to make their lifestyle normal, even to the point where it is taught to schoolchildren that 2 daddies is ok.
 
I truly believe we are headed down a slippery slope in regards to some very basic human traits. Such as intolerance and violence.

Some how we have been taught to think that both are negative 100% of the time.

That is just not true. Sometimes violence and intolerance are exactly what the human race needs.

What we need to work on is determining when.
 
Quote from WTL:

No such right exists the way you define it.

I think it's called the pursuit of happiness, I'm sure that would include freedom from getting flesh eating bacteria or getting attacked by perverts...

What's with this WTL moron, I see this a lot. Assertions presented as if they need no explanations...
 
Quote from maxpi:

I hate queers. ...but on the political playing field... I hate them big time. They represent the open minded left to me, if you disagree they think they have the right to "leap on the stage and rip the tiara off of you". That is what that blogger, Perez Hilton, said he would do if she won the title...

You guys do each other in the hairy stinking asshole and want us to accept you as married couples? Get lost. You brought us AIDS and refused to close the bath houses where you sell dope and live out your sexual addictions, now you brought us flesh eating bacteria and still refuse to close the bath houses... get off the world fags... politically that is, I mean "get off the world" only in the most loving and proactive sense of those words.... because I love contributing to your health care costs, I really do... and seeing how the big bad queers can dominate a forum, I really enjoy that too...
Quote from Wallet:

Homosexual unions are an abomination, immoral and totally unnatural, unless you can reproduce via Asexual reproduction like some type of plants, fish or better yet a worm.

But Gays don't want to have someone tell them they are wrong, instead they want the vast majority to cater to their repulsive lifestyles.

The left is real quick to tout this whole intolerance crap, yet they are guilty of the very same thing they accuse others.

Your gay shit offends me, and I'm in the majority, so the law should send you back to the closets, and make the public sector gay-free.

Quote from Mercor:


...The Gays have a different agenda. First they hijack words from the language like Gay and Rainbow. Now they want to steal the word marriage.

They want to make their lifestyle normal, even to the point where it is taught to schoolchildren that 2 daddies is ok.

Quote from 151:

... Sometimes violence and intolerance are exactly what the human race needs...

Quote from maxpi:

I think it's called the pursuit of happiness, I'm sure that would include freedom from getting flesh eating bacteria or getting attacked by perverts...


Dito
 
Quote from Wallet:

what bout my rights to live in a society free of things that I find repulsive

You dont have the right to live in a society free of things you find repulsive. That is not implied by pursuit of happiness in any way.

There are millions of Americans. Each American finds something repulsive. If we were to eliminate all things repulsive to any American, we would have nothing. I may find you repulsive. I do not have a right to eliminate you from society.
 
Quote from 151:

I truly believe we are headed down a slippery slope in regards to some very basic human traits. Such as intolerance and violence.

Some how we have been taught to think that both are negative 100% of the time.

That is just not true. Sometimes violence and intolerance are exactly what the human race needs.

What we need to work on is determining when.

Are there universal truths and morals for humans beings that apply across cultures? The ten commandents?

Problam is that we allow different societies to impose their beliefs even if it interferes in the inalienable rights of others in that society. Things such as stoning women, child marriages.
 
There is a sizable group that wants to make adult-child sex legal.

If we decide that anything goes, what is wrong with this?

I watched the NY Governor with a large group of "Marriage Equality Now" behind him. They are trying to make a choice into a poor, downtrodden minority.

As someone said above, why can't adults now have loving sexual relationships with children? how about dogs?

Why not clone humans? Breed chimps with people? etc. etc.
 
Quote from TraderZones:

There is a sizable group that wants to make adult-child sex legal.

Its called The South and they already have that crap.The 'conservative' South.Land of the Southern Baptist Church/Literal interpretations of the Bible...just ask Jerry LEE Lewis.
Its funny,I think most conservative red states allow really gross adult-child marriages.
Its the liberal states that dont allow it.MAybe you should move to a liberal state.Maybe you are a closet liberal or closet something.
 
I think the really unfair aspect of this whole episode is being overlooked. This girl was probably denied the crown because she announced a personal opinion in favor of traditional marriage. She was careful to say that she wasn't trying to impose her views on others. Her opinion for herself only. Of course, that was intolerable to the thought control nazis pushing the radical homo agenda. Anything less than supine acceptance of their position is an outrage.

The result was this pervert Perez Hilton threw an hysterical fit that she not get the crown. This is an open and shut case of religious descrimination. Donald Trump and the event should be sued over it. Or maybe they should just announce it is restricted in the future to women who are willing to deny their religious faith and go along with whatever a judge suggests, however immoral it might be to them.
 
Back
Top