Reply to DaddysBoy:
RESPONSE PART 1
Iâll be clear.
I am very happy with my strategy and have NO intention of changing it.
On my very first post, I think I stated my goals clearly as follows:
âI hope we can discuss in some detail the topics related specifically to this type of strategy.â
Another post: âA strategy is just a strategy. The implementation or methodology is what makes it work or not.â
Another post:
âLearning how to do the trades and what they are is the price of admission to this club, but that is the EASY part. Learning the terminology is easy. Learning how to operate a trading platform like InteractiveBrokerâs is challenging, but this is still the EASY part.
The hard part is what follows, but the hard part is still common sense.
My goals are to discuss the issues that are challenging in using these spreads and determining what are the BEST solutions to these challenges.
Here are the big challenges:
1. Stock selection and market timing. Everybody who invests or trades has these problems. But the techniques used by participants in this strategy are vastly different from those used by day-traders, long term investors, and by those who use a thousand other spread strategies different than this one. Bull spreads donât work so well when the market is crashing down around our ears. So we donât enter these spreads anticipating that scenario. My contention is we don't have to become stock gurus, we have to become good at picking our sources of information.
2. Position management. What do we do when stocks rise and when they fall? What can we do to reduce risk and losses, and to maximize profits? What is a good exit strategy for this specific type of spread? When is the optimum time to implement these management techniques?
The post by FullyArticulate mentioned that things can go bad very quickly. He is absolutely right. When the shit hits the fan, it happens so fast it takes your breath away! These spreads are leveraged, and they move a lot from day to day. We expect that! We donât depend on luck or prayer, or good luck charms. The only way we withstand that vicious onslaught is to have a LOT of confidence in the prospects of the sectors and stocks we selected, or at least our ability to find the sources of information about them that we trust, and also to have a PLAN for position management to handle the situation. The novice should not be overly fearful about this. You stick your toe in the water and try it out first. You will grow into it.
3. How to properly diversify for safety. What are the consequences of having multiple positions in the same stock but with different strike dates or different strike levels? How does that affect margin requirements?
4. How to anticipate early executions and plan for them. How to anticipate expiration problems and how to avoid them.
5. How much cash do we keep on hand to handle maintenance issues? Rolling spreads? How can we raise cash from our positions when we need to?
There are many more issues that concern traders but they are more general in nature, like money management, margin issues, etc.
So Iâll listen to arguments about what is better bull put spreads or bull call spreads, but honestly I donât have any of the problems you talk about. I can enter and exit the positions just fine (mostly). I can easily find spreads that yield my target of 50% per year profit, assuming I have handled stock selection properly. I donât have a big problem with liquidity issues. I feel I am making optimal use of the funds I have available. If I can grow my portfolio by 40 to 50% anually, I really have no complaints.
I want to learn better techniques for stock selection and sector selection and timing my entries. All the rest is secondary.â
I donât know how to be more clear.
RESPONSE PART 2:
Iâm no expert on synthetics, but I have looked into the subject to the degree that I wanted to.
I even keep the following notes on my palm pilot:
*************************
OPTION SPREAD TYPES:
EXAMPLES WHERE STOCK IS AT $75
DEEP ITM BULL CALL DEBIT SPREAD
BUY THE 65 - SELL THE 70 CALLS
PAY 400 PER CONTRACT, 100 PROFIT IF EXERCISED
RISK 400
SUCCESSFUL WHEN STOCK STAYS ABOVE 70.
DEEP ITM BULL PUT CREDIT SPREAD
BUY THE 65 - SELL THE 70 PUTS
RECIEVE 100 CREDIT, AND 400 REMOVED FROM SMA (MARGIN REQUIREMENT)
RISK 400
SUCCESSFUL (EXPIRES) WHEN STOCK STAYS ABOVE 70.
Owner of 70 put makes me buy stock at 70 (if stock is below 70), then I make someone else buy it at 65. when stock stays above 70, I keep the credit. If stock is at 67, I have to pay 70 but can only sell it at 67.
DEEP ITM BEAR PUT DEBIT SPREAD
SELL THE 80 - BUY THE 85 PUTS
PAY 400 PER CONTRACT, 100 PROFIT IF EXERCISED
RISK 400
SUCCESSFUL (EXERCISED) WHEN STOCK STAYS BELOW 80.
Owner of the 80 puts make me buy the stock at 80 (if stock is below 80), and I make someone else buy it at 85, and make a 5/shr profit
DEEP ITM BEAR CALL CREDIT SPREAD
SELL THE 80 - BUY THE 85 CALLS
RECIEVE 100 CREDIT, AND 400 REMOVED FROM SMA (MARGIN REQUIREMENT)
RISK 400
SUCCESSFUL (EXPIRES) WHEN STOCK STAYS BELOW 80.
Now I hope we donât have to argue about my personal notes.
The reason I keep these notes in my possession constantly is cause I know I may have to implement one of these strategies on a moments notice if the market suddenly changes direction.
When things get interesting, and you have to work fast, on any given stock at any given moment, one strategy might work better than another. These notes will quickly let me analyze a situation when I donât have time for proper research and planning.
So when I was experimenting, I tried out all this stuff. What seemed to be consistently better (for me) was the Bull call debit spread. I have no apology to make about that. You like what you like and I like what I like.
*****************************
Quote from daddy'sboy:
I think you're a little confused here. I'm talking about SELLING the deep OTM BULL put credit vertical vs. BUYING the deep ITM BULL call debit vertical. The 2 trades are identical and management would be identical, i.e. when you close your debit vertical early you'd also close the credit vertical early - you know, put/call parity stuff.
Response: Iâm not really that confused.
Maybe an example would help: yhoo @ 28.56
buy yhoo apr 25/27.50 call vert for db 1.95 using natural b/a - max risk is 1.95, max credit 0.55
sell yhoo apr 25/27.50 put vert for cr of 0.6 natural b/a - max risk is1.90, max credit 0.6.
Response: I thought the example helped, but maybe I missed the point. What is the point?
As I said, the difference between the 2 is better fills on the otm spread and if you let them run to expiry and underlying is in your favour then it (credit spread) just expires worthless. The debit spread at expiry will be autoexercised for the long and auto assigned for the short legs (assuming you're at max profit). I believe that these auto exercises and assignments will incur some commission in either one or both legs.
Response: My broker does not charge for exercising options. Also there is no fee for assignments, of either leg.
In summary there's no point comparing them in a real trade because management would be the same. The only advantage being the bid/ask fills and fees for the credit spread.
Best
daddy's boy