Merkel Wins German Election... WTF??
- Thread starter Scataphagos
- Start date
Does not matter the least bit. He is legally allowed to follow the person on the public walkways in his neighborhood.
It matters when determining who the aggressor is.If one retreats and one pursues,the pursuer is the aggressor.
You are wrong again. As provided in the Florida law I cited and the results of the trial. The aggressor is the individual who make deliberate physical contact with the other individual (as defined by law).
There is no video or eyewitness to that.There would be no deliberate physical contact if Zimmerman wouldn't have pursued a retreating Martin.
Obviously people can tell you over & over that all the physical and other evidence supports Zimmerman's account. But you just aren't going to listen & learn, eh?
The evidence supports Zimmerman getting beat up by Martin,and thats why he got off.The evidence supports that Zimmerman was the aggressor,which is why he shouldn't have.
Your definition of aggressor does not align with the legal definition of aggressor under the law in any state. Either you can align with the law or just live in your fantasy world.
I was using the dictionary definition of aggression.
Back to the start.Black people need to vote in local and state elections with the same numbers they voted for Obama,even more so they can elect officials to make laws that say if someone runs from you and you get out of your car and pursue them you can't claim self defense if a fight occurs.Common sense since one person tried to avoid conflict and the other pursued it.
Last edited:
For the record I side with the women in this situation.She was in her office minding her business when the thief brought danger to her.I side with Martin for the same reason,he was walking home minding his own business when George Zimmerman brought danger to him.