Merkel Wins German Election... WTF??

"I said black people hold some blame for the racist system against them because they don't go out to vote to change it."

The large majority of black people have voted for Democrats for decades. Are you saying the best way to change the "racist system" is for them to vote for Republicans?

This is the only reasonable inference to make.


The post was about black voter turnout.I said Trump would not be President if Hillary had the same black voter turnout as Obama did and if black voter turnout was the same as Obamas in every local and state election they could change many of the laws that let Zimmerman and many of those murderous cops go free.
 
Last edited:
The post was about black voter turnout.I said Trump would not be President if Hillary had the same black voter turnout as Obama did and if black voter turnout was the same as Obamas in every local and state elections they could change many of the laws that let Zimmerman and many of those murderous cops go free.

There you go pouring BLM hate on cops and armed citizens defending themselves from thugs again. And once again you don't understand the difference between executives / legislators who are elected versus actions taken by courts. Local or state elections would not change the outcome of the Zimmerman case. A court and jury is responsible for declaring what Zimmerman did was completely justified based on the evidence.
 
you don't understand the difference between executives / legislators who are elected versus actions taken by courts.


I understand the difference quite well.Legislators who are elected could change the laws that the courts would have to obey
 
Last edited:
Local or state elections would not change the outcome of the Zimmerman case.


If they changed the law and say you cant claim self defense in a case where you are the initial aggressor the outcome in Zimmermen type cases would be different.
 
If they changed the law and say you cant claim self defense in a case where you are the initial aggressor the outcome in Zimmermen type cases would be different.

Any individual is allowed to walk around their community on public walk-ways with the expectation they will not be attacked. Under no rationale can Zimmerman be considered the initial aggressor. When an individual is tackled by a thug who then keeps punching them while on top of them -- then they are allowed to shoot the thug in self-defense. The self-defense law is reasonable and supported by the majority of people in Florida.
 
If they changed the law and say you cant claim self defense in a case where you are the initial aggressor the outcome in Zimmermen type cases would be different.

By the way -- here are the Florida statues. Your claims about "initial aggressor" are completely incorrect. Go read section 776.041. The trial deemed that Zimmerman was not the initial aggressor; he was physically attacked by Trayvon Martin. Initial aggressor means that the individual initiated physical contact, Zimmerman did not... as established by the trial.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/STATUTES/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html
 
Under no rationale can Zimmerman be considered the initial aggressor.


Martin was walking,Zimmerman was in his car.The 9-11 operator asked Zimmerman if he was following Martin,Zimmerman said yes.9-11 operator told Zimmerman police are on the way and they don't need him following Martin.The fight happens far from Zimmermans car,where Zimmerman would have been if he wasn't the aggressor.
 
Martin was walking,Zimmerman was in his car.The 9-11 operator asked Zimmerman if he was following Martin,Zimmerman said yes.9-11 operator told Zimmerman police are on the way and they don't need him following Martin.The fight happens far from Zimmermans car,where Zimmerman would have been if he wasn't the aggressor.

Once again... you are allowed to walk on public walkways in your neighborhood. Walking on a public walkway does not make you an aggressor. ATTACKING someone like Trayvon did makes someone an aggressor. Was it unwise for Zimmerman to leave his auto after the 911 call? Yes. Did doing so in any way make Zimmerman an aggressor? No (as established by the trial).

You should read up on this and learn the law.
 
By the way -- here are the Florida statues. Your claims about "initial aggressor" are completely incorrect. Go read section 776.041. The trial deemed that Zimmerman was not the initial aggressor; he was physically attacked by Trayvon Martin. Initial aggressor means that the individual initiated physical contact, Zimmerman did not... as established by the trial.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/STATUTES/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/0776.html


No proof in that except Zimmermans word.There is proof Zimmerman was following Martin in his car and got out of his car to follow Martin.Zimmerman was the aggressor
 
you are allowed to walk on public walkways in your neighborhood. .


You are,but this wasn't Zimmerman just taking a leisurely walk.The jury would have looked at the circumstances as to why Zimmerman got out of his car that night to walk on the public walkways and the answer is clear.Martin was the one who had the right to self defense after Zimmerman got out of his car and went after him.
 
Back
Top