I get it, they reduced the polling places and made them more distant to make it easier for people to go vote. Makes sense.
Once again you demonstrate you have not read the information in detail and are only pushing points out of context to drive your political agenda rather than the truth. Lets' focus on the facts:
- The largest growing counties in North Carolina reduced the most polling places as they relocated smaller polling venues to larger more geographically distributed ones.
- All of these large growing counties (near Raleigh, Durham and Charlotte) have Democratic majority election boards which decided on the polling locations.
- The population change as many more people moved into growing areas shifted to the suburbs from old downtown areas. Having more geographic distribution of polling places to allow easier access to voting for over 80% of the population makes sense rather than forcing everyone to go downtown. The only people who may not like the reduction in the number of polling places downtown are those who live there.
- Currently over 90% of the state population has a voting venue within 5 miles of them on election day. That number formerly was under 30% a mere two decades ago. Even with a reduced number of polling places - easy access to voting has improved.
- The Republican majority state legislature made voting days & hours uniform across the state .
- The Republican majority state legislature increased the number of early voting hours by over 24,000.
- The biggest complainers over the increased voting hours were the Democratic majority election boards in growing counties. They did not like the increased hours since it represents an added expense.
How in your fantasy is the above a form of "voter suppression"?