McCain to Palin - "Shut up and look pretty, let me do the talking"

You could say you are pope benedict the xvi. I don't know who you are and have no reason to trust you.

There is a difference between talking and doing. W does a lot of tough talk about Iran when everyone with half a brain knows war with Iran will not happen during bush administration. No matter what anyone says about "keeping military option on the table" In 1998 there was an increase in tension with saddam but it was not going to war no matter the tough talk. That is the key difference. Same Bill Clinton that got out of Somalia was going to invade Iraq full bore?

As I said does not matter who you are. If you post on this forum you could never have been anything other than a low man on the totem pole.

Responding with military force could be air strikes. Iraq was divided with no flyzones back then btw...


Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Well other than running for Congress in 2004, being an elected GOP official from 1999-2008, being briefed personally by Don Rumsfeld, you're right. I know nothing. This is case in point why I get pissed ala' John McCain when I post on ET. Because people like you are FUCKING MORONS!

Christ were you born last week?

February 18, 1998
Web posted at: 9:01 p.m. EST (0201 GMT)
COLUMBUS, Ohio (CNN) -- The Clinton administration's plan to launch a military strike on Iraq ran into plenty of flak in the American heartland Wednesday.

At a town meeting held in St. John Arena at Ohio State University and aired exclusively on CNN, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Defense Secretary William Cohen and National Security Adviser Sandy Berger encountered a noisy, opinionated crowd and considerable opposition to another war with Iraq.


Albright was drowned out at one point by a group chanting, "One, two, three, four, we don't want your racist war," as she tried to explain U.S. policy to the audience of 6,000.

The heckling became so intense at one point that Albright interrupted CNN's Judy Woodruff and said, "Could you tell those people I'll be happy to talk to them when this is over. I'd like to make my point."

Similar outbursts greeted Cohen and Berger as they laid out again a U.S. position that is familiar to those who have followed the building crisis in the media.

They said the United States would prefer to see a peaceful resolution and hopes that U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan will make significant progress when he visits with Iraqi officials this weekend.

But if Iraqi President Saddam Hussein doesn't allow U.N. arms inspectors to have unrestricted access to all weapons sites in Iraq, they reaffirmed that a U.S.-led coalition will respond with military force.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Whatever. No one as stupid as you could even inherit money much less earn it....

You know how much money I've got and you know how stupid I am. A troll who spends his entire life patrolling this site - you pathetic, racist ,lying scumbag.
 
I was a VERY low man on the totem poll. Fuck I wasn't even ON the totem poll. I was an ant around the base of the poll. What I'm telling you though isn't even inside baseball it's just that 99% of the people aren't well informed.


Quote from IShopAtPublix:

You could say you are pope benedict the xvi. I don't know who you are and have no reason to trust you.

There is a difference between talking and doing. W does a lot of tough talk about Iran when everyone with half a brain knows war with Iran will not happen during bush administration. No matter what anyone says about "keeping military option on the table" In 1998 there was an increase in tension with saddam but it was not going to war no matter the tough talk. That is the key difference. Same Bill Clinton that got out of Somalia was going to invade Iraq full bore?

As I said does not matter who you are. If you post on this forum you could never have been anything other than a low man on the totem pole.

Responding with military force could be air strikes. Iraq was divided with no flyzones back then btw...
 
Quote from ak15:

You know how much money I've got and you know how stupid I am. A troll who spends his entire life patrolling this site - you pathetic, racist ,lying scumbag.

I'm here because I've become ADDICTED to fucking with you anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Christian scumbags.
 
Most people are not as informed as they need to be to contribute to the political process. Frankly there ought to be some testing before one can vote. The trouble is this program would be run by the morons in government and thus would be mismanaged no different than they mismanage the defense department, etc.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

I'm here because I've become ADDICTED to fucking with you anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Christian scumbags.

try not to use that last one.................. it weakens all your previous points
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

I'm here because I've become ADDICTED to fucking with you anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Christian scumbags.

The ony person you are capable of fucking is yourself you miserable addict. You're a disgrace to human society and all decent Americans of which I am proud to be a part of.
 
And by the way mr. pabst, one key difference between clinton in 1998 and neocons in 2002 was becuase there was "something" going on in 1998 namely the Lewinsky thing. Wag the dog anyone? All this tought talk could have been a simple distraction.
 
Back
Top