What?
McCain says Trump has two choices on wiretap claim: provide evidence or retract
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
What?
I literally just showed you the evidence that came directly from an anti-Trump newspaper and you're just like...
Sorry. Where have you been. Flynns calls were tapped and the transcript released to the press. Trumps calls to the Mexican and austrailian pm were tapped and transcript released to the press.
BBC said FBI applied for two fisa warrants targeting four trump team officials and were rejected. Got through on third try.
New York Times front page say themselves trump was tapped
What doesn't compute here ?
Where was the evidence? I didn't see it.
The first two comments regarding Flynn and the Mexican/Australian officials were not evidence of Trump tower, before the election, being ordered tapped by Obama. Did you not read the Trump tweet?
As for the BBC's claim regarding Trump officials being targeted by the FBI, assuming the BBC is factually correct (which is a large assumption), where is the proof behind the assertion?
The BBC saying the FBI tapped Trump (which I didn't see so you can provide a link if you wish) is no different than the Washington Post saying the Russians hacked the election. Neither provided any hard evidence, only conjecture.
What doesn't compute here is that you continue the same route you criticized the left of doing, yet suddenly it's acceptable because you like the narrative.
Last edited:
I am not asking anyone to compromise their personal standards, or take a less than well thought out tweet as gospel. I'm just sayin far as message board banter goes I'll hold Trump to the same standards of truth and facts as the left holds themselves to. It's all fast and loose with little to no accountability for disseminating misinformation and in many cases outright lies. Until the left provides some actual and verifiable evidence for their continuing need to explain the humiliation suffered by their political hacks, I can't get real twisted up as Trump pokes back at them. He won, they lost and when they grow up and accept the reality that Clinton was just a piss poor candidate maybe then we can all have an adult conversation about what's best moving forward. Until then, fuck'em.
My friend. The Trump Team was under FBI/DNI investigation before the election for connections with Russia. No connection was found.
That's all admitted. Do you acknowledge that? Yes or no?
But then you turn around and say its 'impossible' Trumps phones were tapped before the election, when the FBI/DNI just admitted an active open investigation has been ongoing into Trump, beginning prior to the election.
How do you suppose they "investigate" Trump, my friend? Could you elaborate on that for us, if not by electronic surveillance of his phones/internet?
Lets start there.
So you don't trust anything the MSM posts. Okay. That's fair. But its logically incongruent. And you fail to see that.
An open investigation into anyone in America nowadays, at that level, involves electronic surveillance of phone/internet/cell phone etc.
How else would they investigate Trumps Team?
And oh, it just so happened that Flynn, one of his top aides who was under investigation by the FBI/DNI, did happen to be wiretapped, with that convo illegally leaked to the press, despite that tap being totally "inadvertent", as Flynn was just 'caught up' in routine eavesdropping of the Russian Ambassador.
You actually think that's all just a big coincidence, do you?
FOX News: Obama tapped Trump. Used Britain as a go-between. No paper trail.
Digest, and let us know what you think
