McCain says Trump has two choices on wiretap claim: provide evidence or retract

[viruscore1]

 

[Tsing Tao]

Whose "judgment" are you more likely to trust when it comes to cancer? An oncologist or a naturopath?

That depends. If the oncologist had a financial and personal interest in making sure I followed his treatment plan, I might just consider the naturopath.

 

[Tsing Tao]

You're right to a degree that I compared politics to something distinctly different. However, I do believe that if your epitaph reads, they followed all the rules, while the enemy does a victory dance on your grave, honor doesn't mean much at that point. You don't have to rape and kill women and children to win a war, but you do need to get your hands dirty and some tactics may be less than appealing. An unwillingness to do that assures defeat.
Trump isn't afraid to play in the mud. This is something new for the left to digest while they make their own wild assed, completely unfounded claims of impropriety. Yeah, it's schoolyard crap, but that's where we're at.

Regardless of what Trump is willing to do, I don't have to compromise my personal beliefs, morals and viewpoints as a conservative voter. Just because Trump spouts something off on twitter doesn't mean I have to accept it as fact without proof.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

That depends. If the oncologist had a financial and personal interest in making sure I followed his treatment plan, I might just consider the naturopath.

Because you only see self interest, and the "naturopath" has none?

Darwin says hello.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Because you only see self interest, and the "naturopath" has none?

Darwin says hello.

No, I'd have to question the naturopath's interests as well. In the aforementioned example on Trump vs. the intelligence agencies that you continue to try to get me to choose from in belief, I choose neither.

I merely answered the way I did because you gave me what you assume to be an obvious choice between an oncologist and a naturopath/homeopath. I do not equate the intelligence agencies to an oncologist.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

No, I'd have to question the naturopath's interests as well. In the aforementioned example on Trump vs. the intelligence agencies that you continue to try to get me to choose from in belief, I choose neither.

I merely answered the way I did because you gave me what you assume to be an obvious choice between an oncologist and a naturopath/homeopath. I do not equate the intelligence agencies to an oncologist.

In retrospect, I should have made the comparison between an oncologist and a homeopath, because while naturopaths may have some limited albeit questionable usefulness, homeopaths are full-on quacks. My bad.

 

[Tsing Tao]

In retrospect, I should have made the comparison between an oncologist and a homeopath, because while naturopaths may have some limited albeit questionable usefulness, homeopaths are full-on quacks. My bad.

Another thing you and I disagree with. Homeopaths are good for telling you what doesn't cure your ills. Even bad information is information.

 

[peilthetraveler]

Targeted Trump aids, where the investigation proved fruitful. Not Trump, and not his campaign. You boys sure are ham-fisted when it suits you.

Ok...here is the tweet. Question: Who owns the phones/pays the phone bill in Trump tower? Donald Trump, correct? Trump didn't mention who they were targeting only that the phone lines that he pays for were tapped and they were in fact tapped which you have now agreed happened. So if the phones are owned by Donald Trump, isn't it HIS wires that are being tapped? Who they were targeting or who might be using HIS phones isn't relevant. Who's lines were tapped is.

Now who is hamfisted?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Ok...here is the tweet. Question: Who owns the phones/pays the phone bill in Trump tower? Donald Trump, correct? Trump didn't mention who they were targeting only that the phone lines that he pays for were tapped and they were in fact tapped which you have now agreed happened. So if the phones are owned by Donald Trump, isn't it HIS wires that are being tapped? Who they were targeting or who might be using HIS phones isn't relevant. Who's lines were tapped is.

Now who is hamfisted?


View attachment 171655

Except Trump has no evidence to support his claim. Otherwise he's golden. Or should I say, orange.

 

[java]

No, which is precisely why good conservatives need to hold themselves to higher standards.

Well then stop blaming conservatives every time a republican says something stupid.