McCabe is beginning to sweat a little- maybe even more than a little

T

TreeFrogTrader

I don't know about Andy. The atmospherics have changed a bit in the last six months.

Normally, if I read an article about how Comey is being interviewed about McCabe then I would just shrug and assume that there would be some report at some point saying that "while Mr. McCabe did not follow departmental policy we were unable to conclude that his actions rose to the level of criminal conduct" blah, blah, frigging, blah.

Not so sure now because Rosenstein, Comey and all the other rats in the central office are turning on him. They know that the IG's report and the general mess in the FBI now are going to require some more scalps and if it is not Andy's then it will be theirs. We know Rosenstein would throw his own grandmother under the bus first.

Andy will be pining for the good old days when all he was worrying about was his pension before it over. Won't help his job search much either if he loses his law license. He needs to be charged with obstruction of justice too, not just the little perjury thing. He used the state intelligence apparatus to try to influence the outcome of an election and obstructed justice at every step of the way to keep Trump's opponent up and running and protected.

As I said, odds are his buddies will decline to prosecute him but then again I see the pressure on the FBI to deliver scalps unless they want it to be theirs so all bets are off. I think he is in trouble.

Cheer up lefties, maybe Trump will pardon him. (I got into a little joke there).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...d678ec08c2f_story.html?utm_term=.4e75302a55aa
 
Last edited:
TreeFrogTrader said:
I don't know about Andy. The atmospherics have changed a bit in the last six months.

Normally, if I read an article about how Comey is being interviewed about McCabe then I would just shrug and assume that there would be some report at some point saying that "while Mr. McCabe did not follow departmental policy we were unable to conclude that his actions rose to the level of criminal conduct" blah, blah, frigging, blah.

Not so sure now because Rosenstein, Comey and all the other rats in the central office are turning on him. They know that the IG's report and the general mess in the FBI now are going to require some more scalps and if it is not Andy's then it will be theirs. We know Rosenstein would throw his own grandmother under the bus first.

Andy will be pining for the good old days when all he was worrying about was his pension before it over. Won't help his job search much either if he loses his law license. He needs to be charged with obstruction of justice too, not just the little perjury thing. He used the state intelligence apparatus to try to influence the outcome of an election and obstructed justice at every step of the way to keep Trump's opponent up and running and protected.

As I said, odds are his buddies will decline to prosecute him but then again I see the pressure on the FBI to deliver scalps unless they want it to be theirs so all bets are off. I think he is in trouble.

Cheer up lefties, maybe Trump will pardon him. (I got into a little joke there).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...d678ec08c2f_story.html?utm_term=.4e75302a55aa
More...
Flynn's purpoted 'crime' seems like child's play compared to what is referenced in the article. I hope justice is served equally among everyone involved.
 
Andy already proved what he is: a liar. He threatened to not go down by himself. Good luck with that.

Not that I don't want to see the other snakes get their heads chopped off, too.
 
House Committe meeting with Horowitz has been moved out so presumably the release of the report was moved out. Most likely because the reports that Comey was just interviewed are true and Horowitz wants to work/see with the outcome of that before releasing the report.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
House Committe meeting with Horowitz has been moved out so presumably the release of the report was moved out. Most likely because the reports that Comey was just interviewed are true and Horowitz wants to work/see with the outcome of that before releasing the report.
More...
Rats ratting on rats....should be quite an entertaining report...
 
26kpfe.jpg



292qf3.jpg
 
Last edited:
Justice Department looking into possible leaks from former Senate aide
1481297890398.png

By Chad Pergram, Mike Emanuel | Fox News
1528414107551.jpg



The Justice Department is looking into whether a former Senate Intelligence Committee aide leaked classified information. (File)

A mysterious move by the Senate Wednesday night is part of a Justice Department inquiry into a former Senate Intelligence Committee aide who may have leaked classified information.

The Senate unanimously approved a resolution allowing the committee to provide records to the Justice Department in response to a request related to the investigation.

The aide's identity and the lawmaker for whom he or she worked is not clear, but on Thursday, The New York Times published an article saying that federal investigators had seized email and phone records relating to one of its reporters, Ali Watkins.

Watkins previously had a romantic relationship with James A. Wolfe, the Senate Intelligence Committee’s former director of security, The Times reported.

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, requested unanimous consent to approve the resolution at approximately 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, as the Senate was poised to adjourn for the day.

"I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to consideration of S. Res. 536, submitted earlier today," Portman read off a slip of paper.

A legislative clerk on the dais then read the following: "A resolution to authorize document production by the Select Committee on Intelligence."

Portman, who is not a member of the intelligence committee, then made the standard request heard multiple times each day on the Senate floor: "I ask unanimous consent that the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate."

No one objected, meaning the Senate approved the resolution.

The Senate often conducts business and approves measures via "unanimous consent." That means no member objects to approving a given matter. Such issues are typically cleared with all 100 senators in advance. However, many aides and senior sources were unaware that the resolution was coming to the floor.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., and ranking member Mark Warner, D-Va., issued a joint statement Wednesday:

"As noted in the Senate Resolution, the Department of Justice has sought the assistance of the Committee in a pending investigation. The Committee is cooperating with the Department on this matter. Any questions about the investigation should be directed to the Department of Justice."

A spokeswoman for the Justice Department declined to comment or elaborate on the resolution when asked
 
Optionpro007 said:
The New York Times published an article[/URL] saying that federal investigators had seized email and phone records relating to one of its reporters, Ali Watkins.

Watkins previously had a romantic relationship with James A. Wolfe, the Senate Intelligence Committee’s former director of security, The Times reported.
More...
An NYT's reporter (former Buzzfeed reporter) sleeping with the director of security for the Senate Intel Committee.....
wtf? :D
Nothing to see here.
images
 
So, the Inspector General's report is set for release next Thursday.

Then after that, it will be another year of fighting tooth and nail to be able to see the parts that Rosenswamp redacted to protect his arse.

Situation normal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top