Marshall J. Jones, Daytrader: August 31, 1935 to Nov. 9, 2007
- Thread starter version77
- Start date
If you want to figure out who z10 is, all you have to do is follow his speech patterns. For example, he uses the work "wanker" quite a bit. From wiki, we learn:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanker
We then do a search for wanker on ET and can likely figure out Z10s many aliases:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/searc...=2087031&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending
We note that kiwi_trader is amongst one iof the posters. Kiwis are popular in Australia I believe. You can probably figure out the rest if you really care.
nitro
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanker
We then do a search for wanker on ET and can likely figure out Z10s many aliases:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/searc...=2087031&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending
We note that kiwi_trader is amongst one iof the posters. Kiwis are popular in Australia I believe. You can probably figure out the rest if you really care.
nitro
It is inductive, not deductive. I never claimed it is scientific, but solving mysteries mixes both art and science. It is no difference than trying to do hand written analysis to solve a crime. All we have here are speech patterns, extreme hate, and other ET personality traits as exposed over nearly a decade by z10 on ET. For example, hapaboy may find some support in his thesis (that z10 is a child sex predator, his thesis not mine) that z10 may have been "BOYPLUNGER".
Go through the messages. Read them, you will see z10 in many of those aliases.
nitro
Hmm, i dont see it. There are what ,4 billion people on the planet, most of whom are nutters, and an "inductive" assessment points the finger at Z, despite the physical impossibility of his being all these posters.
I'll stick with a deductive process, thanks, nitro.
As shocking a troll as the z may be, it should be easy enough to look in the mirror, and see aspects of this obfuscating, blame throwing creature in the mirror, indeed, you have just shown a glimpe of that very golum-like hatred.
It is ok that you don't see it. Many others will see it, and many others won't. That seems irrelevant. The evidence stands on it's own.
yw.
I will stick to all forms of logic allowed by eons of inquiries and research into rational thinking. Induction is a cornerstone of mathematics. If it is good there, it is good for me anywhere. I am a card carrying member of Induction. Priceless...
http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction_and_induction
...
nitro