Quote from Epiphany:
The original poster was not attacking 'trading based on time periods greater than 1 day.'
The orignal poster was attacking - 'longer-term trading based on predictions not probabilities.'
In other words, he is against longer-term trading where you accept only binary outcomes (huge profit, or you get a margin-call)
Trading is indeed based on probabilities - and thus one should have an exit strategy - if a trade goes sour
You have given me an honest reply, so I will endeavor to do the same to you.
***
Trading is whatever the mind of the trader makes it out to be. There are numerous examples of traders who trade in a fashion which most people would not agree with ... but they propose that this is what
"works for them", and they are adamant about it.
Just a few examples:
1. Traders who use Japanese candlesticks (or any of the numerous asian trading techniques).
2. Traders who take long-term position trades ... and allow thousands of dollars of profit to evaporate because that is the way they have structured their systems.
3. Traders who propose to catch every twist and turn that the market makes, taking each move to a profitable conclusion.
4. Traders who micro scalp, and claim this is the path to riches.
5. Traders who like to keep going, thinking that over time, the more setups they take, ultimately the more profitable they will be.
6. Traders who prefer to quit while they are ahead, relying on very "tight" setups and active money management to achieve their profits over time.
7. Traders who take positions based on
macro views, and hold those trades so long as whatever criteria they used to enter them still holds true ... Marketsurfer falls into the last category, so, regardless of what price action is doing, he'll hold his trade to its logical conclusion, whether that be
feast or famine.