You don't even know what the data sets represent guy. It's obvious. Given my education and career background, you are barking up the wrong tree.
Ok, whatever you say. LOL! I have access to data you only dream about big guy. surf
You don't even know what the data sets represent guy. It's obvious. Given my education and career background, you are barking up the wrong tree.
hmm. Well... were they?
I've done it also and my results tell me that you're nuts. Aside from the fact that any conscious and observant child can see trends in stock charts, you make some self-serving distinction between 'drift' and 'trend'.I tell you the tools to use, you need to do the work. I have already done it, if you don't believe me, run the numbers yourself. surf
It is not unfair, it is necessary to make the system work. The "randomers" have to pay for the profit of the "predictables".
But I have another question: some say that 90% of all traders don't make money.
If this is true, is it not the ultimate proof that markets are not random? Normally 50% should lose money. 90% looks not random to me.
Folks, even a trader of the meanest intelligence knows that trend is not about whether or not the next bar will be up or down. Get right.That's an upward drift, different from a trend. If theres a trend, you can quantify it. How many upmoves increase the chances that the next move will be up?
...Its impossible to predict when a trend will begin...
Oh my.
Oh my.
Oh my.
"Marketsurfer is correct: There is no Trends!" --- There are only Turns! lol
What would you say?