Originally posted by daniel_m
or spontaneous-organic-discord - depending on what mood she's in..

correct, but this only applies to your very narrow definition of "movement".Originally posted by yabz
Conclusion: we cannot reject the hypothesis that the movements of the shares and indexes in these tests are random.
Originally posted by 2Good2Care
Here we go again. I smell a hundred pages of junk from the usual ET peanut gallery.
NONE of you, I REPEAT none of you have the academic qualifications nor the expertise to speak to chaos theory (least of all you aphie) or apply randomness to the market in the rigorous mathematical sense that this topic requires so why don't ya all just...
SHUT YER YAPS!![]()
All you do is muck things up by your UNQUALIFIED OPINIONS.
Make a stand for truth ...JUST SHUT UP!
Brother Pussy,Originally posted by 2Good2Care
Here we go again. I smell a hundred pages of junk from the usual ET peanut gallery.
NONE of you, I REPEAT none of you have the academic qualifications nor the expertise to speak to chaos theory (least of all you aphie) or apply randomness to the market in the rigorous mathematical sense that this topic requires so why don't ya all just...
SHUT YER YAPS!![]()
All you do is muck things up by your UNQUALIFIED OPINIONS.
Make a stand for truth ...JUST SHUT UP!
Where does one find all these "successful mechanical systems - of which there are many"?Originally posted by darkhorse
And of course, the existence of successful mechanical systems- of which there are many, and which can be easily verified- naturally begs the question: why is anyone still questioning whether the market can be beat in the first place???
Thanks for the hot tip! That's the one place I haven't looked. Are they in every box or is it one of those "many will try - 5 will win" giveaways? Do I need to collect all 10,000 - with one in each individually sealed box? Oh well, I guess I'll spend a fortune on Cracker Jack boxes to add to my bookcase. Thanks again.Originally posted by metooxx
Cracker Jack boxes ...
