Quote from gms:
I wouldn't say it does. If your model was adapt at coming in just when the price was moving up, and at it's fastest pace to boot, you wouldn't be waiting so long to see 15% moves, and you wouldn't have the losses at all. Maybe you meant to write, "that's what my quantitative model tries to uncover." And it does matter if you're early or late regarding where in the move you come in. If you're late, the upside potential is potentially more exhausted than if you're in early.
Quote from mrmarket:
Overall, the model has been extremely successful. I am very happy. Do you think I've been just lucky?
Quote from mrmarket:
Since the market is upwardly biased in the long run, there is no need to try to be a market timer. The only skill you need is being able to identify stocks that will outperform the market. If you have this skill, in the long run you will make money.
Quote from TM_Direct:
Yes, to some extent.....but your selection method is good but i believe your TIMING is poor....what do you see in these stocks now that you didn't see during the run up of 40-50-60%??
Maybe you should jump in quicker and increase your return when they run up 25%
Quote from mrmarket:
Actually, it's 45 for 50...but who's counting....
Since I only hold for 15% gain, it doesn't really matter if I'm in a stock early or in a stock late, the key is to get in when the stock is moving up its fastest. That's what my quantitative model uncovers.
Do you like my new website? Much better than Yahoo, in my opinion.