in regards to the RTH session vs. globex.
Bolter, i think sticking to regular trading hours for your MP calcs is arguably a good way to go. i haven't seen any data one way or the other about whether the 24 hr data is useful for MP
but... since (if i understand correctly) you use volume @ price levels vs. time @ price levels to calculate your MP #'s, i doubt it would make any difference, since there is such light volume on the overnight session. it would obviously affect TPO's, but not prices @ volume, since it is so thin overnight, the volumes at any overnight price levels would be a tiny fraction of the volumes one sees during the normal trading hours of the cash indexes (and the premarket of an hour or so.)
i play a lot of YM gaps (my favorite trades are gap trades, and I find YM by far the most consistent to play gaps with) and I also use floor trader pivots and some fibs, in addition to market profile #'s.
i have found globex hi's and low's to be good levels to mark on a chart, because quite frequently they are turning points for the market. i find (at least for the YM - i don't trade ES) that globex hi's and lows are often retested during the day and then we see a reversal. so, it's a good reference point to use. i also find that classic floor trader pivots are FAR more accurate as turning points when you calculate them from the 24 hr session (obviously if globex hi/lows never exceed the cash session hours, the pivots are the same, otherwise they are different).
i have got a lot out of this thread by the way bolter.
price is king, and i think we (people who look @ price and price type things such as MP, tick, etc.) will always have an edge over "indicator traders" who are using lagging indicators, such as stochs, macd's, or MA's.