So you want to group all accusers together rather judge each on their individual merits.
No. I don’t know why you think that makes sense.
Again, try to follow the discussion and try to bring some intelligence to the discussion.
In regard to the grouping together, it depends on what the point or issue is being addressed.
If statements are being made about how all accusers must be believed, blah, blah, blah and that is the main support for an accusers position, then, yes, sometimes it might be helpful to the accused or to the public to see what the entire group of accusers looks like. As I said, you have some real dingbats in there along with Ford, such that not even the dems want to go there.
An open examination of the dingbats proves beyond doubt that even the dems know that many accusers are flaky and fake and that undermines their narrative that all accusers must immediately be believed.
Although your binary mind cannot follow what I am saying, I am actually promoting the idea that each case must be reviewed individually rather than speaking against it. Dems and lefties who are argue that all accusers must immediately be believed to compensate for past injustices are the ones are advocating group think, not me.
So to repeat for those who ride the short bus to get to the forum every day, dems need to be careful about trying to expand this investigation into the swetneg/avenettie types. That could backfire and undermine Ford by demonstrating to the public- once again- that you have to be careful about bogus claims by flaky broads. As I said, most of the dems also see that. It was very noticeable where they did not want to go in that hearing and where they would have gone if they believed some things. One or two made some mention, but their collective strategy and pre-arrangement was to not go there and that was smart.