If there is to be a meaningful investigation, the FBI needs to go over every aspect of Dr. Ford's life since the alleged incident. If she's not hiding something, why wouldn't she agree? After all, she is such a great citizen and so brave and all. If she is some sort of sociopath or deluded TDS nutcase, don't we have a right to know? We have had no opportunity to look at her life and try to assess if she is trustworthy. A committee appearance with no opportunity for background checks proves nothing.
She has chosen to share one alleged incident with us. She would have us believe one brief incident that amounted to nothing traumatized her for the rest of her life. So much so that as a grown women, she insisted on a second front door. That does not sound like a particularly stable or rational personality to me.
Alternatively, she could be one of the growing ranks of false accusers, women whose thirst for the status of victimhood leads them to conflate or invent false charges. We know she was a fervent liberal activist and a proud anti-Trump resistance zealot. She surely could envision the adulation the next Anita Hill would receive. She grew up in the privileged DC private school world and could easily spin a plausible, if unprovable , tale. It's very possible as well that she had no intention of it getting this far. She just wanted to throw some sand into the process with her anonymous letter. Perhaps she didn't realize that outside of academia, people kind of expect you to back up charges like this rather than let you destroy a man without showing your face.
She has chosen to share one alleged incident with us. She would have us believe one brief incident that amounted to nothing traumatized her for the rest of her life. So much so that as a grown women, she insisted on a second front door. That does not sound like a particularly stable or rational personality to me.
Alternatively, she could be one of the growing ranks of false accusers, women whose thirst for the status of victimhood leads them to conflate or invent false charges. We know she was a fervent liberal activist and a proud anti-Trump resistance zealot. She surely could envision the adulation the next Anita Hill would receive. She grew up in the privileged DC private school world and could easily spin a plausible, if unprovable , tale. It's very possible as well that she had no intention of it getting this far. She just wanted to throw some sand into the process with her anonymous letter. Perhaps she didn't realize that outside of academia, people kind of expect you to back up charges like this rather than let you destroy a man without showing your face.
