Making JH' SCT and all his material alive

Obviously, I won't be able to do all I wanted to today.

I don't feel at ease at all with what follows. Like always when there is something new that is to be incorporated, it brings the mess back in my mind. I'm used.

Here is the first part of the Log and chart I want to do today, and what I did does not make much sense.
For example, here I only find BO of rtl on DV, so BO,T1. I wonder what would happen if the close of the bar was outside prior rtl on IV. And the "prior rtl" is still not clear in my mind. Anyway.


part 1 chart & Log 060519.png
 

Attachments

  • Log 1 060519.jpg
    Log 1 060519.jpg
    265.1 KB · Views: 12
Part 3 06/05/19 chart & Log

Finally, I found a BO of prior rtl on IV. I don't DD how to deal with that for now. I just included the bars in question (and see them as a kind of Not BO,T1). This will surely be solved soon.

Also trying to incorporate the new IDs of PC after SQU.

part 3 chart & Log 060519.png
 

Attachments

  • Log 3 060519.jpg
    Log 3 060519.jpg
    268.3 KB · Views: 6
Part 5 06/05/19 chart & Log


part 5 chart & Log 060519.png


As for squishing : the last bar of the chart is interesting. If I squish the one but last bar into the prior one, then when last bar comes I see a FTP. I began at this moment to measure volume to search for an UL...and there is the interesting thing : if I measure volume relatively to prior bar, it's UL.....but if I compare to the volume bar corresponding to the two but last bar, then it's not. So I began to wonder, after squishing, wchi volume bar is at hand, and will be the one from which to compare next volume bar ? Logically, here, I DD that I'm to take the bar from which I built/adapted my last PC : so it's the two but last bar (16:00). I even wonder if I'm not to sum the two volume values (16:00 vol and 16:05 vol) and then compare the last volume bar to that sum. I mean, if we merge price, why can't we merge volume ?
All this is maybe all wrong and incorrect, but I wanted to talk about it cause there's something to be cleared up here.

AND
this reminds me something about after wait : after a wait, which volume bar is the reference from which to measure volume of the next measurable volume bar ? I've recently read in my JH's printed posts (butt handed on a daily basis thread) that we're to use the last measurable/measured volume bar, not the volume bar of the Wait bar. BUT, I think I remember you @Sprout already had answered me about this. I need to refind this post. I want this to be cleared up.

AND
This also reminds me about degap and Lats : in some cases, after degapping, the Lat is still not there, although by the immediate (no degapped) geometry, it is not. I would like to know what to explore/work/know/do in thoses cases, cause since the beginning there are cases where it's too obvious we can't keep on seeing a Lat that is geometrically appearing. For example, here :

degap and lats.png


But here, things get more complex for me :

confusion on degap and lat.png


I'm so confused with this kind of situation that after reviewing some charts and logs I've done, I noticed that sometimes I considered there was a Lat and filled in the log with the appropriate way, so when there's a Lat, and other time I did not !


I just wanted to talk about several operating points... I notice now I have many. I'll make a list and post it.
 

Attachments

  • Log 5 060519.jpg
    Log 5 060519.jpg
    126.2 KB · Views: 10
WchPl said:
Obviously, I won't be able to do all I wanted to today.

I don't feel at ease at all with what follows. Like always when there is something new that is to be incorporated, it brings the mess back in my mind. I'm used.

Here is the first part of the Log and chart I want to do today, and what I did does not make much sense.
For example, here I only find BO of rtl on DV, so BO,T1. I wonder what would happen if the close of the bar was outside prior rtl on IV. And the "prior rtl" is still not clear in my mind. Anyway.


View attachment 203949
More...

The bar numbers are messed up. The day starts at the 9:30 which is the opening bar which closes on 9:35. The scale of the chart isn't matching the bar numbers on the log.

The 9:50 bar on the chart is an Ab, (use leftmost T1)
The PP5 needs a BM at it's low
 
WchPl said:
Part 2 06/05/19 chart & Log

View attachment 203956
More...

PP3 needs a BM at it's high.
P1 assigned is on the first measurable bar which is lat4 BM,rev. I know that on my last charts I did it the way you are doing it and since we have progressed to laterals, might as well start incorporating all the logic of them even if it's difficult.
The same with PP3 again with the BM at it's high.
The PP4 a BM at it's low
The next bar becomes a BM, rev
Which makes 11:55 an Ab and BO,T1 in addition to the BM,rev. BO,T1 - since there was a T1 in the sequence. BO,T1 also takes priority.
 
WchPl said:
Part 5 06/05/19 chart & Log


View attachment 203983

As for squishing : the last bar of the chart is interesting. If I squish the one but last bar into the prior one, then when last bar comes I see a FTP. I began at this moment to measure volume to search for an UL...and there is the interesting thing : if I measure volume relatively to prior bar, it's UL.....but if I compare to the volume bar corresponding to the two but last bar, then it's not. So I began to wonder, after squishing, wchi volume bar is at hand, and will be the one from which to compare next volume bar ? Logically, here, I DD that I'm to take the bar from which I built/adapted my last PC : so it's the two but last bar (16:00). I even wonder if I'm not to sum the two volume values (16:00 vol and 16:05 vol) and then compare the last volume bar to that sum. I mean, if we merge price, why can't we merge volume ?
All this is maybe all wrong and incorrect, but I wanted to talk about it cause there's something to be cleared up here.

AND
this reminds me something about after wait : after a wait, which volume bar is the reference from which to measure volume of the next measurable volume bar ? I've recently read in my JH's printed posts (butt handed on a daily basis thread) that we're to use the last measurable/measured volume bar, not the volume bar of the Wait bar. BUT, I think I remember you @Sprout already had answered me about this. I need to refind this post. I want this to be cleared up.

AND
This also reminds me about degap and Lats : in some cases, after degapping, the Lat is still not there, although by the immediate (no degapped) geometry, it is not. I would like to know what to explore/work/know/do in thoses cases, cause since the beginning there are cases where it's too obvious we can't keep on seeing a Lat that is geometrically appearing. For example, here :

View attachment 203985

But here, things get more complex for me :

View attachment 203986

I'm so confused with this kind of situation that after reviewing some charts and logs I've done, I noticed that sometimes I considered there was a Lat and filled in the log with the appropriate way, so when there's a Lat, and other time I did not !


I just wanted to talk about several operating points... I notice now I have many. I'll make a list and post it.
More...


The degapping consideration example with the lateral you have right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top