You mark it, and let us know if/when you prove to be correct. But today, you were way off.
MAGAtards won't wear masks
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Hehe, I'll go one further...
When Pfizer convinces the scientific community that after 6-12 months we need a booster shot or else the effectiveness of the vaccine starts dropping, it will be Fauci going, "Folks, less than half of the fully vaccinated people have gotten their boosters. We are becoming more vulnerable to the virus and it's variants. Please continue to wear your masks and maintain social distancing so we can protect the fully vaccinated who are no longer fully vaccinated.
Oh, and stay away from movie theaters, they are massive hotspots being confined inside and all. Once the talkies came around, movies became shit anyway."
First things first. So, are you saying, that if the scientific community deems a booster shot is needed for continued effectiveness, due to variants; that that would be bullshit?
that is a model moron...
not documented outdoor spread...
I have told you that multiple times... yet
you just lie and lie and lie
not documented outdoor spread...
I have told you that multiple times... yet
you just lie and lie and lie
"Conclusions
Existing evidence supports the wide-held belief that risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is lower outdoors but there are significant gaps in our understanding of specific pathways."
You presented meta study bullshit... not evidence of spread outdoors.
Do the work give us the links to real studies or admit you are full of shit.
here are some of the studies from your meta study
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32656368/
Abstract
Background: Concern about the health impact of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in widespread enforced reductions in people's movement ("lockdowns"). However, there are increasing concerns about the severe economic and wider societal consequences of these measures. Some countries have begun to lift some of the rules on physical distancing in a stepwise manner, with differences in what these "exit strategies" entail and their timeframes. The aim of this work was to inform such exit strategies by exploring the types of indoor and outdoor settings where transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to occur and result in clusters of cases. Identifying potential settings that result in transmission clusters allows these to be kept under close surveillance and/or to remain closed as part of strategies that aim to avoid a resurgence in transmission following the lifting of lockdown measures. Methods: We performed a systematic review of available literature and media reports to find settings reported in peer reviewed articles and media with these characteristics. These sources are curated and made available in an editable online database. Results: We found many examples of SARS-CoV-2 clusters linked to a wide range of mostly indoor settings. Few reports came from schools, many from households, and an increasing number were reported in hospitals and elderly care settings across Europe. Conclusions: We identified possible places that are linked to clusters of COVID-19 cases and could be closely monitored and/or remain closed in the first instance following the progressive removal of lockdown restrictions. However, in part due to the limits in surveillance capacities in many settings, the gathering of information such as cluster sizes and attack rates is limited in several ways: inherent recall bias, biased media reporting and missing data.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; cluster; coronavirus; lockdo
2.
Closed environments facilitate secondary transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
H Nishiura, H Oshitani, T Kobayashi, T Saito… - MedRxiv, 2020 - medrxiv.org
Commissioned by the Minister of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan, we
collected secondary transmission data with the aim of identifying high risk transmission
settings. We show that closed environments contribute to secondary transmission of COVID-
19 and promote superspreading events. Closed environments are consistent with large-
scale COVID-19 transmission events such as that of the ski chalet-associated cluster in
France and the church-and hospital-associated clusters in South Korea. Our findings are …
Cited by 132 Related articles All 5 versions
Existing evidence supports the wide-held belief that risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is lower outdoors but there are significant gaps in our understanding of specific pathways."
You presented meta study bullshit... not evidence of spread outdoors.
Do the work give us the links to real studies or admit you are full of shit.
here are some of the studies from your meta study
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32656368/
Abstract
Background: Concern about the health impact of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in widespread enforced reductions in people's movement ("lockdowns"). However, there are increasing concerns about the severe economic and wider societal consequences of these measures. Some countries have begun to lift some of the rules on physical distancing in a stepwise manner, with differences in what these "exit strategies" entail and their timeframes. The aim of this work was to inform such exit strategies by exploring the types of indoor and outdoor settings where transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to occur and result in clusters of cases. Identifying potential settings that result in transmission clusters allows these to be kept under close surveillance and/or to remain closed as part of strategies that aim to avoid a resurgence in transmission following the lifting of lockdown measures. Methods: We performed a systematic review of available literature and media reports to find settings reported in peer reviewed articles and media with these characteristics. These sources are curated and made available in an editable online database. Results: We found many examples of SARS-CoV-2 clusters linked to a wide range of mostly indoor settings. Few reports came from schools, many from households, and an increasing number were reported in hospitals and elderly care settings across Europe. Conclusions: We identified possible places that are linked to clusters of COVID-19 cases and could be closely monitored and/or remain closed in the first instance following the progressive removal of lockdown restrictions. However, in part due to the limits in surveillance capacities in many settings, the gathering of information such as cluster sizes and attack rates is limited in several ways: inherent recall bias, biased media reporting and missing data.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; cluster; coronavirus; lockdo
2.
Closed environments facilitate secondary transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
H Nishiura, H Oshitani, T Kobayashi, T Saito… - MedRxiv, 2020 - medrxiv.org
Commissioned by the Minister of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan, we
collected secondary transmission data with the aim of identifying high risk transmission
settings. We show that closed environments contribute to secondary transmission of COVID-
19 and promote superspreading events. Closed environments are consistent with large-
scale COVID-19 transmission events such as that of the ski chalet-associated cluster in
France and the church-and hospital-associated clusters in South Korea. Our findings are …
Cited by 132 Related articles All 5 versions
Last edited:
Can't believe this is even a debate.
Landmark case study finds coronavirus easily transmitted in ideal outdoor conditions
https://www.utsa.edu/today/2020/09/story/covid-spread-outdoor-conditions.html
Landmark case study finds coronavirus easily transmitted in ideal outdoor conditions
https://www.utsa.edu/today/2020/09/story/covid-spread-outdoor-conditions.html
So you choose a single sentence out of the conclusion and ignore the rest of the study. So typical.
There are both studies in labs and studies of actual outdoor spread.
Yes there are over a million references to studies showing COVID spreads outdoors -- especially in non-socially distanced settings where people are not wearing masks.
Stop being a troll and spewing nonsense all the time.
apparently are you are also a massive idiot...
i just told gwb that is a model...
not one case of outdoor spread is documented.
i just told gwb that is a model...
not one case of outdoor spread is documented.
you are a fucking idiot... there is no rest of the study..
it is some moron doing a google search or some search and reviewing headlines or some other fake study concept.
its a not a real study documenting outdoor spread.
"Methods: We performed a systematic review of available literature and media reports to find settings reported in peer reviewed articles and media with these characteristics. These sources are curated and made available in an editable online database. Results: We found many examples of SARS-CoV-2 clusters linked to a wide range of mostly indoor settings. Few reports came from schools, many from households, and an increasing number were reported in hospitals and elderly care settings across Europe. Conclusions: We identified possible places that are linked to clusters of COVID-19 cases and could be closely monitored and/or remain closed in the first instance following the progressive removal of lockdown restrictions. However, in part due to the limits in surveillance capacities in many settings, the gathering of information such as cluster sizes and attack rates is limited in several ways: inherent recall bias, biased media reporting and missing data."
it is some moron doing a google search or some search and reviewing headlines or some other fake study concept.
its a not a real study documenting outdoor spread.
"Methods: We performed a systematic review of available literature and media reports to find settings reported in peer reviewed articles and media with these characteristics. These sources are curated and made available in an editable online database. Results: We found many examples of SARS-CoV-2 clusters linked to a wide range of mostly indoor settings. Few reports came from schools, many from households, and an increasing number were reported in hospitals and elderly care settings across Europe. Conclusions: We identified possible places that are linked to clusters of COVID-19 cases and could be closely monitored and/or remain closed in the first instance following the progressive removal of lockdown restrictions. However, in part due to the limits in surveillance capacities in many settings, the gathering of information such as cluster sizes and attack rates is limited in several ways: inherent recall bias, biased media reporting and missing data."
No. Re-read what I posted...
When Pfizer convinces the scientific community that after 6-12 months we need a booster shot or else the effectiveness of the vaccine starts dropping...
Fauci will be on board, not because it is scientific evidence. It is what Pfizer will tell (and is telling as we speak) to the scientific community, and he (Super agent NIH Fauci) will buy into, and try to convince the rest of the world that this is "the way".
I mentioned earlier that there needs to be an independent panel that can verify whether or not Pfizer's claims of the need for a booster is true.
Last edited: