Madoff's $50 billion is a LIE

Quote from gnome:

Here's a thought...

If Madoff wasn't making any money but still distributing income to investors, perhaps some of the investors got back "most" of the money.... their own plus some other peoples'.

Interviews indicated some people had been investing with him for 20-30 years. If they had been pulling out annual distributions of 9-12%, all of the money could have been paid out.

Of course, investors THOUGHT they were pulling out "income only" and were expecting their principle to still be on deposit... not likely the case.


good point.

surf
 
I cannot believe some of these posts, some are idiotic and some posters seem to think they have come up with an unique view of what transpired when all the while stating some of the obvious highly probable and known possibilities.
 
I remember on another post about 2-3 days after the news hit, I summed up the reported losses taken by listed companies (globally) - and it racked up more than $20 bn dollars, with additional "undisclosed" amounts. Whether it's 50 or not, well it'll take a while for us to know.

But $20 bn and change ain't that bad, either - right?
 
Has anyone considered that madoff's actual investments, if there were any, actually did make money for years on end?

why wouldn't this be possible and in effect, likely, given the information flow he would be privy to??


surf:confused:
 
Quote from Signate67:

I cannot believe some of these posts, some are idiotic and some posters seem to think they have come up with an unique view of what transpired when all the while stating some of the obvious highly probable and known possibilities.
Which category do you fall in?
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Has anyone considered that madoff's actual investments, if there were any, actually did make money for years on end?

why wouldn't this be possible and in effect, likely??


surf:confused:
In a classic ponzi scheme the person who is perpetuating the fraud takes in money from investors and sets up a shell organization that has the look and feel of a legitimate institution, but actually is just there to fool the investors giving him the money (think *Universal Studios*).

Speculating that he actually made money is just that ... speculation.

It is far more likely that he merely kept a record of who-was-owed-what while funneling new monies into his own personal account.

Bottom Line ... in all likihood he didn't make money, and if he did, he considered it as his to keep.
 
Quote from B. Rowshan:

Yes! you're a true kiss ass, name dropping wannabee. A spineless jellyfish who cried their way back to ET (the ultimate humiliation).

madoff destroyed the lives of soo many people, and so throroughly and maliciously embarrassed the jewish and NY communities, that any meaningless speculation that the losses were "not as much as thought" makes me sick to my stomach. He destroyed so much of the fabric of society, yet you want to speculate that "losses aren't as bad as thought".

You are a true fat loser (if that's you in the pics). I'd like to pound on you for starting this idiotic thread.

For a guy that's had an acount for 2 months you sure have strong opinions.

and btw, f**K the NY Jewish community. They are the biggest winners out of all of this (and funny thing, they always seem to be in the middle of it). The whole thing was a gigantic movement of $$$ from gentile to jewish pockets. You wont read about it in the big name papers (guess who owns them), but if you look around the web and do a little math you'll realize that on a net-net basis the jewish community is WAY better off than if Madoff had never existed. Given Madoff's plea, the US taxpayer will get to re-pay the Jewish Charities. "Compulsory donating" so to speak...
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Having read some interesting commentary on Niderhoffer's site, I tend to agree that $50 billion in losses is an outright lie and at the very least an extreme exageration.

It seems that most of the money likely went back to the investors as it would be nearly impossible to hide or spend that much

http://www.dailyspeculations.com/wordpress/?p=3444

any thoughts?




Certainly some of the money went back to original investors.

However if you have the correct banking connections, you can hide any amount of money.

The Rothschild's combined family assets are easily worth 10x what Made-off "lost" , and yet none of them show up in any of the "wealthy lists".

Made-Off hooked himself right into the nexus of global banking cabal using his various religious charities.

For him hiding 50 billion would be a days worth of work.

For a scandal this HUGE, it barely makes a blip in any of the major "news-papers". Much of the "news" on made-off is on page 10 near the end in small fine print.

Like I said, once you are hooked into the cabal, you are golden.
 
Quote from texrex2002:

^ and by the way, no offense to any individual jewish ET members intended.

How could they be offended after you told them to fuck off?

But I agree it is certainly possibly the first 70% or so of investors broke even or made some money after withdrawals.

Bailing them out would be more reprehensible than bailing out Goldman Sachs was.
 
Back
Top