Looks like Joe the Pumber was the game changer

Quote from Lucrum:

And more importantly, Obama's "redistribute the wealth" response?

This is the point they should continue to make, although I honestly don't know if it will work because I have come to think that, sadly, Americans want socialism.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

OK, so he doesn't have a plumber's license and isn't voting.

Does he work? Pay taxes?

No doubt our esteemed ET liberals will all to happy to quickly point out what I seem to be missing. But how does him not having a license or voter registration card change the substance of his question to Obama. And more importantly, Obama's "redistribute the wealth" response?


Apparently, Joe, the latest example of McCain's bad judgment IS A TAX CHEAT TOO!!!!!!!!!!!

So I'm guessing he ain't payin' dem damn taxes, a sorta of a do it yourself tax cut, just like John advocatin'.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aWDHvDjnDnTs&refer=politics

Seneca
s
 
Quote from Brandonf:

This is the point they should continue to make, although I honestly don't know if it will work because I have come to think that, sadly, Americans want socialism.

So if changing Joe from 36% to 39% is "socialism" is the cutoff 37% or 38%?
 
Quote from seneca_roman:

Apparently, Joe, the latest example of McCain's bad judgment IS A TAX CHEAT TOO!!!!!!!!!!!

So I'm guessing he ain't payin' dem damn taxes, a sorta of a do it yourself tax cut, just like John advocatin'.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aWDHvDjnDnTs&refer=politics

Seneca
s

Your boy Obama had no clue Joe was fraud either. But there Obama sat, defending his policies as they related to Joe as he and McCain debated. Why is Obama's judgement not an issue here?
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

So if changing Joe from 36% to 39% is "socialism" is the cutoff 37% or 38%?

Apparently, Joe takes this tax cut stuff to heart and likes it at 0% (hell, don't we all) by being a tax cheat.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aWDHvDjnDnTs&refer=politics

I think 36.87451% is the point where it stops being conservative, job creatin', not a burden, to being PURE SOCIALISM HELL and confiscatory.

You may disagree as I have heard powerful arguments that 36.7745% is the real cutoff-I think it was from the Heritage foundation.


Seneca
 
Quote from bugscoe:

Your boy Obama had no clue Joe was fraud either. But there Obama sat, defending his policies as they related to Joe as he and McCain debated. Why is Obama's judgement not an issue here?

Why should he have, he probably McCain and his advisers would not be that stupid-so score one for "THATONE" being wrong, no one is perfect.

So what is your take, is 39% where socialism begins and 36% is where conservatives should draw the line?

Seneca
 
Quote from bugscoe:

Your boy Obama had no clue Joe was fraud either. But there Obama sat, defending his policies as they related to Joe as he and McCain debated. Why is Obama's judgement not an issue here?

Because he reasonably addressed the points as given.

McCain seems to be unable to vet.
 
Quote from seneca_roman:

Apparently, Joe takes this tax cut stuff to heart and likes it at 0% (hell, don't we all) by being a tax cheat.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aWDHvDjnDnTs&refer=politics

I think 36.87451% is the point where it stops being conservative, job creatin', not a burden, to being PURE SOCIALISM HELL and confiscatory.

You may disagree as I have heard powerful arguments that 36.7745% is the real cutoff-I think it was from the Heritage foundation.


Seneca

You are clearly a commie because the cutoff is 36.1% Only commies raise Joe's non-paid taxes from 36% to 39%
 
Quote from Lucrum:

OK, without me even checking YOUR "facts" let's say he's a lying cheat.

My question still stands, which you completely avoided.

Lucrum, what group is Joe a representative of?
 
Back
Top