Quote from fhl:
spike500 said:
"Unoriginal or not has nothing to do with the "achievements" of Bush. The results are there. Under who's presidency Iraq was attacked? Which president told lies about the so called nuclear and chemical tread of Iraq? Under who's presidency dollars were, and still are, printed when needed? Under who's presidency energy prices surged to astronomical heights? Under who's presidency terrorism grew exponentially? Which president got so much famous americans against him when he ran for reelections? Which president got so much critics from the western allies and was even abandoned by them, except for Great Britain?"
Since you wanted answers, let me give you some. You want to know who attacked iraq. The coalition of the willing did. You want to know which pres told lies about iraq threat. Clinton and Chiraq did. Try squirming out of the fact that they both talked of these threats before Bush was even elected. Which pres printed dollars? Every president we've ever had. Don't yours? Which pres did terrorism grow exp? Clinton. Which pres got famous americans against him? Name any conservative president. Which president got critics from europe? Any president who is not a neo-communist.
Now that I've answered these, how about you answering some questions.
There are dictators in Africa having people killed by the thousands with machetes in Africa. How come no words from you about them, just how much you hate Bush. There are regimes in certain countries where people are being enslaved because of their ethnicities right now, yet you show no contempt for them, just Bush. Why? I think we already know the answer. We are richer and more powerful than you and that really sticks in your craw, doesn't it?
