Life under Obama sucks. And these numbers prove it
- Thread starter JamesL
- Start date
You have a strange sense of humor if that entertains youbut then, not a whole 'lot about you is normal, is it? That's why you're in Thailand hunting underage girls.
>>>>> That's why you're in Thailand hunting underage girls <<<<<<
Still a bitch harping on the same shit
>>>>> but then, not a whole 'lot about you is normal, is it? <<<<<<
Normal
is depicted in pics belowGo short these pics - young uns are doomed right at starting gate
we're still on normal:
http://www.johnstrausbaugh.com/sn/excerpt/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opposite of the above NORMAL:
is AfterLOS
It's not harping. Trust me, if you want to be a lecherous old goat hunting underage women, then go for it. just don't expect the rest of us to look at you other than a creepy ex-pat.
As for what you posted as normal - I don't consider almost any of that "normal". If you do, then that might explain some of your underlying psychological issues - the ones that surface in 90% of your posts.
Have a happy day, old goat!
It's not harping. Trust me, if you want to be a lecherous old goat hunting underage women, then go for it. just don't expect the rest of us to look at you other than a creepy ex-pat.
As for what you posted as normal - I don't consider almost any of that "normal". If you do, then that might explain some of your underlying psychological issues - the ones that surface in 90% of your posts.
Have a happy day, old goat!
Q.E.D. I've tripled the dose for you. You've now confirmed all my preliminary conclusions. Done deal.
Goodbye moron
Oh no! I've confirmed your conclusions. Now i've done it! How's that DOW top call going?Q.E.D. I've tripled the dose for you. You've now confirmed all my preliminary conclusions. Done deal.
Goodbye moron
You might want to look up Q.E.D. You keep "using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
just saw this ...... I cana't believe I've been wasting time talking to a faggot or worse a ladyboy
I knew Leapup's not had any pussy in over 10 years and I knew fhl is a faggot, but you Tsingtao moderator, no that I should have known but didn't.
--------------------------------------------------------------
This study perfectly explains the obsession that certain ET posters (fhl, LeapUp, TsingTao) have about butts and gay sex. They can't stop talking about the finer details about gay sex regardless of the subject.
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...-likely-to-be-closet-gays-study-finds.282869/
What a place, this ET Political forum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I cana't believe I've been wasting time talking to a faggot or worse a ladyboyI knew Leapup's not had any pussy in over 10 years and I knew fhl is a faggot, but you Tsingtao moderator, no that I should have known but didn't.
--------------------------------------------------------------
This study perfectly explains the obsession that certain ET posters (fhl, LeapUp, TsingTao) have about butts and gay sex. They can't stop talking about the finer details about gay sex regardless of the subject.
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...-likely-to-be-closet-gays-study-finds.282869/
What a place, this ET Political forum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Attachments
fhl .....
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/how-sodomy-became-normal.282867/
Politics forum needs a new name = 2-moon junction Ram
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/how-sodomy-became-normal.282867/
Politics forum needs a new name = 2-moon junction Ram
fhl .....
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/how-sodomy-became-normal.282867/
Politics forum needs a new name = 2-moon junction Ram
You really are fascinated with homosexuality, aren't you? It's quite disturbing. Is that why you moved to Thailand?
The homo stuff is one of Max's favorite angles, too.
But back to discussing the unprecedented hell we're living in because of Obama...
US economy chugging along at 3.5% growth
By Patrick Gillespie @CNNMoney October 30, 2014: 9:13 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
The economy had a smooth summer.
"Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of economic activity, increased 3.5% between July and September over the same period last year, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. It exceeded analysts' expectations and offered more proof of an economy gaining momentum.
"The GDP news comes on the heels of the Federal Reserve's announcement Wednesday to end its bond-buying stimulus program now that the economy is improving. Economists viewed the Fed's decision as a mostly positive sign that growth is picking up, even in the job market.
"Related: Fed ends 6-year effort to stimulate economy
"Analysts projected GDP growth to hit 3% this quarter, according to data from FactSet.
"Consumer spending is the largest factor for U.S. economic growth, and it rose 1.8% in this quarter, a slight drop from the same time a year ago, but better than the bleak first quarter this year.
"Related: 'Mediocre' growth plagues world economy
"2014 had a dicey start. Economic growth dropped 2.1% the first quarter because the extremely cold winter (remember the Polar Vortex) kept many businesses and schools closed for days and people inside their homes. The weather also lowered exports to other countries. The second quarter rebounded well, posting 4.6% growth from the same time a year ago.
"What's next? The IMF forecasts that the U.S. will have 2.2% GDP growth for the year. So far, the nation appears to be on track for that. It's a lot higher than Europe and other parts of the world that have been hit by geopolitics and slowing growth such as Russia.
"The big concern for quarter four is holiday spending. Americans are clearly buying more, but it's still not a level investors and economists want to see to feel confident that the worst is behind.
"Europe's slowdown could also be a drag for the U.S., although so far the impact has been modest.
"I think Europe by itself poses no real threat to the U.S. recovery or expansion," said Dr. Robert Shapiro, former Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs. He is more concerned that a sharp rise in oil prices could hurt the recovery."
Tell me, Ricter, did you bother to look into the GDP components? That usually tells a more complete story than headline scanning.
Q3 GDP Rises 3.5% Despite Sharp Slowdown In Consumption, Pushed Higher By Government Spending Spree
Moments ago, the market was expecting Q3 GDP to print at 3.0%, and was pleasantly surprised when instead it got a 3.5% print, sending all risk assets kneejerk higher. However, a quick glance into the components revealed that things were certainly not as they seemed, with Personal Consumption in Q3 actually decreasing notably from Q2's 2.5%, to just 1.8% in Q3, below the 1.9% Expected, and accounting for 1.22% of the 3.54% Q3 GDP, the lowest Personal Consumption boost to GDP since Q2 2012 excluding the infamous Q1 winter vortex quarter.
Some of the notable moves in Q3 GDP: Inventory, which was expected to boost GDP, was in fact a detractor, leading to a -0.57% net impact on the bottom line. This, however, was more than offset by net trade, which surged from Q2's -0.34% to 1.32% as Imports reversed for the first time since Q1 2013, meaning imports decline in Q3 suggesting a sharp slowdown in end demand in the US, which is also why inventories slid. One wonders just what all those PMI indices were looking at if domestic industries not only ground to a halt but reversed from Q2?
So what happened to boost Q2 GDP if that core driver, the US consumer was not there? Simple. Government stepped in, and stepped in hard, with its 0.83% boost to the bottom line GDP the highest since Q2 of 2009!
In other words, the Fed, which yesterday had the advance GDP print in hand, decided to end QE on hopes Government spending would continue. And since government spending in this case was mostly a function of surging National Defense spending, it appears that Janet Yellen is strongly betting on, drumroll, war.
Q3 GDP Rises 3.5% Despite Sharp Slowdown In Consumption, Pushed Higher By Government Spending Spree
Moments ago, the market was expecting Q3 GDP to print at 3.0%, and was pleasantly surprised when instead it got a 3.5% print, sending all risk assets kneejerk higher. However, a quick glance into the components revealed that things were certainly not as they seemed, with Personal Consumption in Q3 actually decreasing notably from Q2's 2.5%, to just 1.8% in Q3, below the 1.9% Expected, and accounting for 1.22% of the 3.54% Q3 GDP, the lowest Personal Consumption boost to GDP since Q2 2012 excluding the infamous Q1 winter vortex quarter.
Some of the notable moves in Q3 GDP: Inventory, which was expected to boost GDP, was in fact a detractor, leading to a -0.57% net impact on the bottom line. This, however, was more than offset by net trade, which surged from Q2's -0.34% to 1.32% as Imports reversed for the first time since Q1 2013, meaning imports decline in Q3 suggesting a sharp slowdown in end demand in the US, which is also why inventories slid. One wonders just what all those PMI indices were looking at if domestic industries not only ground to a halt but reversed from Q2?
So what happened to boost Q2 GDP if that core driver, the US consumer was not there? Simple. Government stepped in, and stepped in hard, with its 0.83% boost to the bottom line GDP the highest since Q2 of 2009!
In other words, the Fed, which yesterday had the advance GDP print in hand, decided to end QE on hopes Government spending would continue. And since government spending in this case was mostly a function of surging National Defense spending, it appears that Janet Yellen is strongly betting on, drumroll, war.