None of above will work. No matter how many years you spend trying to squeeze out useful data from these indicators.
Sounds like you have some wisdom you are forgetting to share so I will ask you to elaborate on what you have learned!
None of above will work. No matter how many years you spend trying to squeeze out useful data from these indicators.
It's reasonably straightforward to trade a chart like this:
View attachment 272039
But in reality, charts sort of look like this:
View attachment 272040
I spent a lot of time trying to figure out how I could eliminate the noise. Options include:
1. Moving averages
2. Tick/renko/range
3. Volume/# of trades bars
4. Line-on-close
etc etc
None of these are truly satisfactory. Moving averages are too slow, 2, 3 need calibration and 4 is pretty much the second chart above.
I ultimately settled on a variant of number of price changes per bar and calibrate it with some fancy python code (not fancy) based on the structure I want to see. I'm getting increasingly frustrated with this because it isn't as clean as (say) the first chart and it still requires me to use whatever little brain I have left to interpret.
How do you eliminate noise in the series?
Yeah of course. But same could be said about not going down for hours.Bullish because it made no attempt to go down. Doesn't mean some sort of bull pattern like bull flag.
View attachment 272051
"Zero" lag.Here is one way.
https://www.mesasoftware.com/papers/ZeroLag.pdf
ZERO LAG (well, almost) By John Ehlers and Ric Way
