Legacy for One Billionaire: Death, but No Taxes

Quote from TrueRange:

I concur, income taxes are not the issue for me. Its the total annihilation of my lifes work by govt leeches that is.

I do like the way you think, kudos. We will agree to disagree regarding the death tax issue.

Well, if government weren't "leeches", it would be a different matter, perhaps even a non-issue, say if we lived in a time of "philosopher kings". Ironically though, the beneficiaries of big estates changing hands often end up IN government, lol. That how plutocracy works.
 
The issue is just as much the government getting the millions as it is the owner of the millions having it stolen from him.

LOL if you aren't alive you shouldn't have property rights, the whole "last will and testament" thing should just be canned huh???? LOL Once you die, the government should raid and plunder your belongings and wealth, and redistribute them as it sees fit???

If Optional the mexican child molester was alive in the colonial days, in the genesis of our nation, he'd be the bitch of the english. He'd be sucking english cock at every opportunity. He'd be ratting out every patriot he could identify, and he'd be accusing people with which he had a personal conflict of being patriots... He would have been the biggest tory loyalist bitch ever.

He hates the very concept of america.

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

A dead man paying taxes?

Nonsense.

The living pay taxes. The living pay an income tax, a tax on income from a gift...money they never actually earned.

So his beneficiaries get a few less million...surely something to cry over.

Once again, this situation illustrates the lunacy of the right.

The beneficiaries didn't earn the money, so the money is not taxed twice for them.

The beneficiaries didn't earn the money...so why do they deserve it in the first place?

The right wing goons always talk about the value of hard work, making your own way in life, pulling yourself up by your bootstraps, that builds the proper character...

What happens is that beneficiaries who never had to earn money...get it handed to them. That doesn't build character. That is not earning the money.

If there was moral consistency in the goonish right wingers...they would be in favor of forcing spoiled rich kids to earn a living, to make their way on their own...not just sponge off their parents death.
 
Synergy is not enforced or regulated, it's something which happens voluntarily. You will not ever achieve a state of synergy with measures that are forcefully rendered.

Your ideas are very old, just like you. Thank god they will die with your generation. Good riddance.

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

The right wingers have no concept at all of synergy in a company. They only think about a pyramid scheme, where they are at the top. That's their goal, to be a master of slaves, not a member of a team that works together to achieve a common goal...
 
Dead people have property rights?

I'd like to see the evidence of that...

Quote from phenomena:

The issue is just as much the government getting the millions as it is the owner of the millions having it stolen from him.

LOL if you aren't alive you shouldn't have property rights, the whole "last will and testament" thing should just be canned huh???? LOL Once you die, the government should raid and plunder your belongings and wealth, and redistribute them as it sees fit???

If Optional the mexican child molester was alive in the colonial days, in the genesis of our nation, he'd be the bitch of the english. He'd be sucking english cock at every opportunity. He'd be ratting out every patriot he could identify, and he'd be accusing people with which he had a personal conflict of being patriots... He would have been the biggest tory loyalist bitch ever.

He hates the very concept of america.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Dead people have property rights?

I'd like to see the evidence of that...

attachment.php
 

Attachments

Is there abuse of the taxpayers in D.C.

Yes.

Do both the right and left have legitimate complaints against the bureaucracy in D.C.

Yes.

Are the people of America all clean and pure, and only D.C. corrupt?

No.

Do the people of America need to improve their own moral status, stop cheating, stop lying, stop loafing, etc.?

Yes.

Our government is a reflection, a microcosm of the pollution of our society.

The people of America are to blame, the government is just a mirror to the status of the people.

It isn't a right or a left perspective, it is an honest perspective of Americans being on the same side, having the same goal, and working together to achieve that goal collectively that produces the synergy and greatness of America.

Quote from Ricter:

I'm going to have to drop this line for now, but I will say that your comment is only true for some. There are in fact justifiably miffed rightists, amongst the tea party even, whose anger is valid, if misdirected. And I'm also referring to those who say government can become too big and too pervasive, which is obviously true.
 
The dead don't own those plots, the living do.

The living could sell the plots and headstones to someone else...not the dead.

As usual, you have made a fool of yourself due to lack of the practice of logic...

The dead have no property rights, no property possession...period.

Quote from Lucrum:

attachment.php
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Ahhh, because they are family.

That's why the monarchy was handed to the children upon the death of the king...because they were family.

Sheesh....

So much for the "earning your keep" lies of the right wing. Proof positive that all the right wants to do is to maintain the family aristocracy...

You cannot possibly be this dumb. You're comparing a country that practices monarchy to people leaving the wealth they've managed to accumulate in life to their children?

There's just no way anyone can be that stupid, so you have got to be trolling.

I also noticed you avoided my question about giving benefits/money to people who did not earn it in respect to the socialism redistribution of wealth that liberals follow. Shocker, that.
 
" You're comparing a country that practices monarchy to people leaving the wealth they've managed to accumulate in life to their children?"

The essential principle is the same.

If there is virtue in making it on one's own, then there is no virtue in spoiling children by giving them wealth so that they don't have to make it on their own...

If you are comparing helping out the poor to survive, to a billionaire bequeathing their money to their offspring so their children can live a lavish lifestyle without every having to work...you would be a fool.
Quote from Ivanovich:

You cannot possibly be this dumb. You're comparing a country that practices monarchy to people leaving the wealth they've managed to accumulate in life to their children?

There's just no way anyone can be that stupid, so you have got to be trolling.

I also noticed you avoided my question about giving benefits/money to people who did not earn it in respect to the socialism redistribution of wealth that liberals follow. Shocker, that.
 
Back
Top