Left skew , being on the wrong side of IQ

[Eight]

Damn, I didn't realize how retarded a lot of Blacks really are. I know I've had some conversations recently that made me go like "wtf?" It's starting to make more sense now, makes it easier for me to get past the lousy treatment I've gotten from Black women. If it just was some stupid bitch Democrats that are encouraged to hate Whitey/Men then it's no biggie really.. It's not on me, it's on them....

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from Eight:

Damn, I didn't realize how retarded a lot of Blacks really are. I know I've had some conversations recently that made me go like "wtf?" It's starting to make more sense now, makes it easier for me to get past the lousy treatment I've gotten from Black women. If it just was some stupid bitch Democrats that are encouraged to hate Whitey/Men then it's no biggie really.. It's not on me, it's on them....

Quite literally this explains why blacks are over represented in diagnosis of mental retardation. So much so the liberal education establishment is at a complete quandary.

Philosophically they can't admit the truth of what their testing tells them . There's undoubtedly pressure to under report black mental retardation in children.

I wouldn't be surprised if they used separate standards.

It also is relevant to the justice system because liberals have difficulty with the concept of executing retards.I suspect 30% of blacks in prison are mentally retarded . Sorry but MR cannot be used as an excuse to avoid justice.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

...I suspect 30% of blacks in prison are mentally retarded . Sorry but MR cannot be used as an excuse to avoid justice.

I agree.

 

[piezoe]

Quote from Mav88:

tell that to Down's syndrome parents, all they needed to do was provide more stimulation.

the external stimulus thing has been known for some time, and once again people are trying to hand wave desperately. There have been studies of children of different races raised in white homes, the results are predictable.

For data like this to bear on the issue of the importance of environment to brain development in infants and toddlers you will need data that controls for age of adoption and social and economic status of the biological and adopting parents. Possibly, if you look at the source of the data you posted some more information might be available, but what you posted by itself is not very helpful in sorting these matters out.

Ideally, what one needs is data for children adopted at birth where the biological parents are similar with regard to educational attainment, social and economic status, and the adopting parents are also similar, but not necessarily in the same cohort with regard to the above criteria as the birth parents. I doubt such data exists.

Down's syndrome is a genetically linked abnormality. It's not germane here.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from piezoe:

1)For data like this to bear on the issue of the importance of environment to brain development in infants and toddlers you will need data that controls for age of adoption and social and economic status of the biological and adopting parents. Possibly, if you look at the source of the data you posted some more information might be available, but what you posted by itself is not very helpful in sorting these matters out.

Ideally, what one needs is data for children adopted at birth where the biological parents are similar with regard to educational attainment, social and economic status, and the adopting parents are also similar, but not necessarily in the same cohort with regard to the above criteria as the birth parents. I doubt such data exists.

2)Down's syndrome is a genetically linked .../B]

Mav didn't even need to respond to your previous post because it was so full of shit.

1) That line of reasoning is just going to embarrass the crap out of you and black culture.

2) And race is linked to what: The color of the first skittles to come out of the package in the waiting room?
PUHLEEZE if you do not get that IQ is genetically linked DON'T POST HERE.

 

[Mav88]

Quote from piezoe:

For data like this to bear on the issue of the importance of environment to brain development in infants and toddlers you will need data that controls for age of adoption and social and economic status of the biological and adopting parents. Possibly, if you look at the source of the data you posted some more information might be available, but what you posted by itself is not very helpful in sorting these matters out.

Ideally, what one needs is data for children adopted at birth where the biological parents are similar with regard to educational attainment, social and economic status, and the adopting parents are also similar, but not necessarily in the same cohort with regard to the above criteria as the birth parents. I doubt such data exists.

Down's syndrome is a genetically linked abnormality. It's not germane here.

Downs syndrome is germane, it proves that genetics has a definite impact on human IQ.

standards of evidence: you take someone's word that environment is the major controlling factor due to their obviously just as uncontrolled environment, but then suddenly demand far better evidence for genetics

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

rcg keeps telling whoppers elsewhere about this subject.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=242743&perpage=6&pagenumber=11

So I'm going to keep pounding away with links to the facts.
Funny how rcg has nothing to say here anymore isn't it?

I started in the 1970′s and never quit. Lately I don’t read much about it because I pretty much made up my mind a long time ago. I still hold out hope that it might be amenable to a closing of the gap, but I get less and less certain over time.

If you spend as much time researching the gap as I have, after a while, the conclusion that it must be generally keeps on punching you in the face. It knocks you down over and over. People who study it that much and still say it’s environmental have pretty much been KO’d 1000′s of times and are standing up once again to fight George Foreman and lose.

I don’t talk about much on here, and officially, my line is only that at the moment in the US, Whites are more intelligent than Blacks by about 13.2 points.

Through a lot of fancy messing around with statistics and some journalistic license, I was able to shave a couple of points off the standard 1 SD gap, but I realize that’s not particularly scientific, only that one can make the case by choosing certain tests. Chuck agrees with me that adult Blacks have shaved ~1.5 points off the gap, we both agree that Black kids have shaved ~5-6 points off the gap.

I would argue that IQ tests are a valid measure of intelligence, and that at the moment, Whites are smarter than Blacks on average. Officially, I am not saying what is causing the gap, but we ought to be discussing the fact that it’s real.
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/black-white-iq-gap-in-the-us/

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Funny thing is , everybody out there 4th grade and beyond knows I'm telling the truth because it's been validated by their personal experience at least in the academic setting.

Mind you a black kid in a regular class is like a white kid in advanced placement .

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

to rcg/trend

You are aware that agast as mrbill is that I make these facts known he hasn't challenged their veracity.

Don't you wonder why the league of liberals for any cause on this board have silently fled attempts to counter my facts?
That should tell you something.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

PHOENIX TRADING

Registered: Mar 2012
Posts: 2329



08-25-12 08:27 PM

from RCG Trader:

1a)You may not because you cannot. You do not understand the term, targeted. 1b)I would not post what I do not clearly understand, and there is very little in this area I do not clearly understand.

2)Are you going to continue talking or are you going to refute my rebuttal to this ridiculous assertion of yours.

I've read most of the article presented by
ned block (phd of nyu) that you presented.

1a)Specifically what targeted term are you referencing?

Please note this is not discussion of undercover covert agent's identities. You can actually use descriptive nouns instead of pronouns.

Well of course unless you intend to to keep the topic of discussion, secret known only to you, like your mythical 5 points (greatly advertised but never mentioned) in another thread.

I've never seen such unbelievable cowardice.
9paraphrasing rcg){oh you won't debate my points, you don't understand my targeted term}, when they've never even been mentioned by name. run away rcg run away .
Funny thing here is all the liberals are cringing at your obvious attempts at obfuscation (yeah I know look it up dumbass).


1b ) I seriously doubt you understand your mystery "targeted term " upon which you evidently wish to hang your argumentative hat, but I'm willing to investigate it.

2) I'll make a rebuttal IF, YOU EVER MAKE ONE!
Describe what rebuttal you are attempting to make, otherwise you're just being silly making irrelevant quotes and associated links.

Once again rcg has run away, bluffing all along?

Notice the trend in creating mythical arguments .
First there were the 5 points he was going to school me on in segments (old thread). Except that he never mentioned 1 but ubiquitously referred to wanting to discuss/address them.


Now we see the same behavior here in red, he's never identified the "targeted "term that supposedly makes his case from his linked drivel.

I mean what could be funnier than that?
bluffing is all rcg has :
1) m-16 and ammo being the same as .22cal (seriously funny shit trying to insinuate "I" should have used google to keep from being wrong"what a moron")
2) bluffing about the mythical 5pts
3) now bluffing about some mysterious "targeted term" that's supposedly going to exonerate his position. To date he's run away with out a peep of what the hell he's talking about.
Must be a double secret probation word.


Yes rcg you keep inadvertently proving my point day after day.