Last Hope... Faithless Electors

In what decade are you stuck? War is an antiquated concept that apparently only the US and some African banana republics cannot let go of. Your entire security and corporate apparatus was hacked, invaded, and harvested just days ago. And the US is incredibly ill prepared to fight this new type of war.

And just for history accuracy's sake. You did not build much of anything after the war, neither in Europe nor in Japan. Credit where credit is due, but don't overvalued it. Or do you seriously believe today's Europe resembles anything alike America? Or Japan? Not economically, not politically, not culturally, not religiously...

War is antiquated until the Russians show up with guns then it’s very much Le chic, isn’t it?

Today’s Europe would not be if it wasn’t for US weapons and military protection for decades.
 
War is antiquated until the Russians show up with guns then it’s very much Le chic, isn’t it?

Today’s Europe would not be if it wasn’t for US weapons and military protection for decades.

Playing parallel universes? The US would not exist without Europe in another.

A cooperation deal was struck, without the US European nations would have armed to the teeth. Without Europe the US would never have developed the atomic bomb (in time).

Russia is always over estimated, possibly because it looks abnormally large on a map and its always been in the interest of the US military industrial complex to exaggerate, it certainly over spends on military but the economy for much of its history struggled to match Italy alone.

The reality is that militarily in tbe context of any attack against the US they needed to control the energy supply, the Middle East had always been the focus because of this. The plan to retain dominance of the Middle East by any means was devised in the 40s. This has kept both Europe and the USSR and China from one direction in check.
 
Last edited:
Playing parallel universes? The US would not exist without Europe in another.

A cooperation deal was struck, without the US European nations would have armed to the teeth. Without Europe the US would never have developed the atomic bomb (in time).

Russia is always over estimated, possibly because it looks abnormally large on a map and its always been in the interest of the US military industrial complex to exaggerate, it certainly over spends on military but the economy for much of its history struggled to match Italy alone.

The reality is that militarily in tbe context of any attack against the US they needed to control the energy supply, the Middle East had always been the focus because of this. The plan to retain dominance of the Middle East by any means was devised in the 40s. This has kept both Europe and the USSR and China from one direction in check.

I'm not sure UsualName is referencing WWII as much as the cold war. I think it's generally agreed the Russians defeated the Germans and we kinda came in and claimed victory. Stalin's thirst for colonialism is often brushed aside however.
 
So before this election there is no instance of a dead person that had voted with a mail ballot?

Yes, not a single instance of fraud had happened in this election when billions are at stake and loopholes are everywhere. I have been fooled and should believe everything CNN and government officials said.

Yes, a Trump supporter voted for his dead father and got caught, should we cancel the election results because of that one action? There are loopholes everywhere and you are welcome to commit fraud and spend years in jail, not a lot of people risk that other than dumb Trumptards.
 
They never showed up uninvited beyond Poland.

And the US would not be at all if it wasn't for settlers originally from Europe. So what?

War is antiquated until the Russians show up with guns then it’s very much Le chic, isn’t it?

Today’s Europe would not be if it wasn’t for US weapons and military protection for decades.
 
It needs to be validated to make sure it goes to the right candidate. You cannot just sweep the serious allegations of massive election fraud and ignore it when future elections could very well be affected as well. Atleast, let the proof be seen by higher courts and a determination made on what remedies if any are needed. Until that is done, Joe Biden would be illegitimate in my view and I am sure huge numbers of Americans would feel the same way.

I don't disagree. But again, if the President of the United States cannot martial the willpower to challenge the results based on all the evidence he (apparently) has, who can?
 
I'm not sure UsualName is referencing WWII as much as the cold war. I think it's generally agreed the Russians defeated the Germans and we kinda came in and claimed victory. Stalin's thirst for colonialism is often brushed aside however.

Yes, I was referencing Cold War period also. USSR vs West proxies and the less noticed Iran vs Saudi cold war ones.

A relative worked on the British atomic (& hydrogen bomb) program (Tube Alloys for bits through to Operation Grapple(s) when he retired from the British Navy). As a kid he showed me on a map why the US could never give up bases around the Middle East.

In a half dozen global war scenarios being able to use or obliterate the oil supply there kept a thumb on Europe should it become unfriendly or fall to the USSR, the USSR itself and any future major Asian player partnering with either against the US.

He beautifully illustrated it with just a few lines :) I wish I could recall better it but I was maybe just ten. It never left me though.

Hence the parallel support of Saudi and others plus Israel as these were blocks to the USSR's & Europe's (or any new dictator following Hitler which the US could not discount) influence.
 
Last edited:
Playing parallel universes? The US would not exist without Europe in another.

A cooperation deal was struck, without the US European nations would have armed to the teeth. Without Europe the US would never have developed the atomic bomb (in time).

Russia is always over estimated, possibly because it looks abnormally large on a map and its always been in the interest of the US military industrial complex to exaggerate, it certainly over spends on military but the economy for much of its history struggled to match Italy alone.

The reality is that militarily in tbe context of any attack against the US they needed to control the energy supply, the Middle East had always been the focus because of this. The plan to retain dominance of the Middle East by any means was devised in the 40s. This has kept both Europe and the USSR and China from one direction in check.

What the fuck are you smoking? What century are you living in? With the exception of Germany Europeans are a bunch of pansies. The Germans literally took over the majority of the continent with little to no resistance. Do you really think it would have been different if the Russians did it?
 
What the fuck are you smoking? What century are you living in? With the exception of Germany Europeans are a bunch of pansies. The Germans literally took over the majority of the continent with little to no resistance. Do you really think it would have been different if the Russians did it?

Guess he is a German American then. Next.
 
Back
Top