Last Hope... Faithless Electors

I would add that the level of voting fraud for this election is much higher than what is being reported. But yes, after the mail-in shit show we just experienced, voting laws need to be tightened.

Voter ID in no way disenfranchises minorities.

ID for voting is completely unnecessary and impacts the poor disproportionately. The most marginalized group in America that probably needs their voice heard more than any other group.
 
Sir, this is an HVAC repair service...

https://abc13.com/amp/mark-anthony-...ed-aggravated-assault-liberty-center/8802235/

"He crossed the line from dirty politics to commission of a violent crime, and we are lucky no one was killed," Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg said. "His alleged investigation was backward from the start - first alleging a crime had occurred and then trying to prove it happened."

According to court documents, Aguirre told police that he was part of a group of private citizens called the "Liberty Center," who were conducting a civilian investigation into the alleged ballot scheme.

According to Aguirre, he had been conducting surveillance for four days on a man who was allegedly the mastermind of a giant voter fraud scheme. Aguirre told authorities the man was hiding 750,000 fraudulent ballots in a truck he was driving.

Instead, the victim turned out to be an innocent air conditioner repairman, court documents said.

Aguirre ran his SUV into the back of the truck to get the technician to stop and get out, according to court documents.

When the technician got out of the truck, Aguirre pointed a handgun at the technician, forced him to the ground and put his knee on the man's back until police came, the court document said.

When Trump won in 2020 there were millions of Democrats who did all sorts of ill advised crap because they believed Hillary should have been President because she won the popular vote. Conspiracies and Revolutionary talk, States bucking the Electoral College etc.

Fast forward to today, Republicans about 70 million of them feel their was substantial voter fraud, enough to effect the outcome of the election. So yeah, their pissed. But this isn’t about playing inside a set rules that need changing, they feel the election was illegally stolen from them.

Regardless of how you feel, it’s very real to them. Unless this is addressed, at the minimum addressing the problems so that no voter feels disenfranchised or cheated, we cannot move forward. The right to vote and freely elect a government is the cornerstone of our nation.

So the fuck em’, round them up, bullshit talk is being spewed by a bunch of people that don’t live here and have zero concern about the American people. They would rather see us eat each other. Which sadly is about to happen if we don’t start finding some common ground and trying to heal the division in this country.
 
ID for voting is completely unnecessary and impacts the poor disproportionately. The most marginalized group in America that probably needs their voice heard more than any other group.
Totally disagree. Voter ID can be made free of charge through local election boards. We do it here, works fine, no one complains.
 
Excuse me, but why exactly is “better validation” needed when we just had the most secure election in our nation’s history?

All this is doing is 1. Legitimizing baseless claims and 2. Hindering rightful voters trying to vote.

Voting laws should be positive not negative. We should have more laws for provisional and mail in ballots. There should nationwide same day voter registration. Every American should automatically be registered to vote.

The "most secure" is about the integrity of the voting system and ensuring they systems are not hacked or compromised. "Most secure" protects the voting system against wholesale "electoral fraud" (e.g. systems programmed or hacked to switch large numbers of votes".

"Most secure" has nothing to do with voter fraud --- voter fraud is carried out by people who are not allowed to vote, vote under assumed identities, or attempt to vote multiple times.
 
So why should inconsequential voter fraud not overturn an election but inconsequential voter fraud disenfranchise minority voters with restrictive policies (ie voter id)? I didn't have time to debunk most of the quoted claims, but let's be honest, half those are in the "3 million illegals voted for Trump" category (ie Texas claims).

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/study-supports-trump-5-7-million-noncitizens-may-have-cast-illegal-votes.310616/

I disagree that Voter ID disenfranchises minority voters when a person can easily get a free picture government id or voting -- and states also allow you to file a provisional vote with other non-picture forms of id. I believe that a picture id system should have safeguards to make it more "permissive" rather than being "restrictive" by adding additional barriers/steps.
 
The "most secure" is about the integrity of the voting system and ensuring they systems are not hacked or compromised. "Most secure" protects the voting system against wholesale "electoral fraud" (e.g. systems programmed or hacked to switch large numbers of votes".

"Most secure" has nothing to do with voter fraud --- voter fraud is carried out by people who are not allowed to vote, vote under assumed identities, or attempt to vote multiple times.

Here is the statement in full:

statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors.There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”
 
Here is the statement in full:

statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors.There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

Yes..... this statement is about the integrity of the system. It is not about someone who showed up and voted using their cousin's name.
 
Yes..... this statement is about the integrity of the system. It is not about someone who showed up and voted using their cousin's name.
the election is secure because fraudulent votes are found and tossed and perpetrators caught. No need to add more rules that take the vote away from people
 
Yes..... this statement is about the integrity of the system. It is not about someone who showed up and voted using their cousin's name.

So what? Still cites the paper trail.

Fraud happens at a frequency of 0.00006, or about 6 times per 10 million votes. There were 31 cases of in person voter fraud between 2000 and 2014.

This election I’m aware of 2 cases in Pennsylvania. Both trying to vote for Trump twice.
 
Back
Top