You're kidding, right? This is the guy who was going to answer all questions and concerns regarding his questionable past? And all he offers up is a pissing contest? But then he skirts requests to either enter a present day contest or make live calls on a suitable platform?Quote from marketsurfer:
...again, what's the big deal?
Yes, you certainly are.Quote from larrywms:
... i am the transparent one...
When did being successful become a crime? Tdog, why not question any technique or approach to the market that Williams has taught? This line of debate goes nowhere. Nobody is being persuaded or can learn anything. Anyone with any kind of visibility has a history that can be criticized.Quote from Thunderdog:
And you are just a vendor. The only thing you are building up is your own coffer, with the tuition and enthusiastic ignorance of others.
I have no doubt that Williams is successful. It is what he is successful at where we may come to a disagreement.Quote from slacker:
When did being successful become a crime?
I think you may be confusing me with someone who comes to ET for any reason other than light entertainment principally during RTH. Frankly, I have a thing about pointing out bullshit when I see, hear or smell it. And ET offers such green pastures...Quote from slacker:
...Tdog, the closer you get to 10,000 posts on ET the more 'strident' your post have become. You might want to reflect on your last few months of postings. Your posts don't seem to be making you any happier or any smarter...
Ok, so your posts are not making you happier or smarter, and if your posts are what you believe to be quality light entertainment; that is sad.Quote from Thunderdog:
I think you are confusing me with someone who comes to ET for any reason other than light entertainment principally during RTH.
Read my earlier post again. I did not write that I believed my posts were "quality light entertainment." That description emerged from your own imagination. For the most part, ET helps keep me occupied during a waiting game. If ET is much more than a source of entertainment for you, then it is I who wish you good luck.Quote from slacker:
Ok, so your posts are not making you happier or smarter, and if your posts are what you believe to be quality light entertainment; that is sad.
Good luck anyway.
Since you claim you have already brought a libel suit against Gallacher (and Wiley), then you must already know what the content is about and don't need me to spoon feed it to you. I refer to ALL of it. As for Gallacher's stuff recounting your encounters with the NFA, they are spot on. I have copies of the documentation, which is identical to what Gallacher described in his book. I have also spoken to an enforcement attorney at the NFA a few years ago who confirmed that Gallacher did not take any content as it relates to the NFA out of context. The rest of the content can be checked in the periodicals to which Gallacher refers. (Stated differently, libel my ass, boyo.) Please enlighten me. What was the basis of your libel claim? Give me some details.Quote from larrywms:
please send me the stuff Gallagehe wrote and I will respond...not that it will matter to you.
BTW, i brought suit for libel against him, and Wiley, sadly i did not learn about the comments until years after they were written so the case with dsimissed, thanks to statute of limitations.