You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Larry Williams Million Dollar Challenge
- Thread starter clarodina
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Do you have a link to that product ?
What does it cost ?
What does it cost ?
Quote from clarodina:
Anyone had brought the Larry Williams Million Dollar Challenge Video Seminar? Any feedback from the video practical trading application?
1.Please read NFA "... deceptive statement " about Larry Williams result .
2. Compare with another result*s .It is not correlated
http://www.robbinstrading.com/worldcup/standings.asp
(Larry Williams 1987 year)
Quote from ssss:
1.Please read NFA "... deceptive statement " about Larry Williams result .
2. Compare with another result*s .It is not correlated
http://www.robbinstrading.com/worldcup/standings.asp
(Larry Williams 1987 year)
please see actress michelle williams 1997 performance.
is this evidence of a conspiracy OR simply good trader teaching daughter how to do it?
what makes sense?
surf
Quote from marketsurfer:
please see actress michelle williams 1997 performance.
is this evidence of a conspiracy OR simply good trader teaching daughter how to do it?
what makes sense?
surf
From author point of view -to be very carefully ..
With high chance that is only propaganda , Larry Williams
won through multiple loss in offset client's accounts .
Loss by client's accounts was more as win by L.Williams account .
Quote from ssss:
From author point of view -to be very carefully ..
With high chance that is only propaganda , Larry Williams
won through multiple loss in offset client's accounts .
Loss by client's accounts was more as win by L.Williams account .
There's a damn good chance that there's more "deception" or "propaganda" in your statements in this thread than there was in Larry Williams trading account.
I guess you're aware that Williams trading account was thoroughly investigated by the CFTC and the NFA. They found no wrongdoing as you suggest.
In fact, as I understand Williams was operating a "pool" at the time. He wasn't managing any individual accounts. The reason this is important is that in order to have done what you suggest, he would have had to always be right in his own account, and always be wrong in the pool account. Now what do you suppose the odds of that are.
Conversely, if he made trades which he did not specify the account (illegal by the way), he would have had to involve Robbins...the broker. Now don't you suppose that when the CFTC investigated this, they would have been able to detect this? And again, let's assume that he guessed the market direction and was wrong. So now he has to place this in the pool account. But he would have nothing in his own account. LOL!
What's more likely is that your information is just plain wrong. Doesn't change the record. Williams was written up for not publicizing an accurate record, which would have included the results of the pool account. The pool account records were terrible.
If you're going to charge Williams with fraud, then perhaps you ought to cite something a little more factual. Because the CFTC didn't charge him with that.
OldTrader
old - do not attempt to reason with sssss... This person is on a trading contest vengeance with no real arguments to support their case.
Quote from ssss:
From author point of view -to be very carefully ..
With high chance that is only propaganda , Larry Williams
won through multiple loss in offset client's accounts .
Loss by client's accounts was more as win by L.Williams account .
How do you explains his daughters success then in 97'?
Quote from OldTrader:
There's a damn good chance that there's more "deception" or "propaganda" in your statements in this thread than there was in Larry Williams trading account.
I guess you're aware that Williams trading account was thoroughly investigated by the CFTC and the NFA. They found no wrongdoing as you suggest.
In fact, as I understand Williams was operating a "pool" at the time. He wasn't managing any individual accounts. The reason this is important is that in order to have done what you suggest, he would have had to always be right in his own account, and always be wrong in the pool account. Now what do you suppose the odds of that are.
Conversely, if he made trades which he did not specify the account (illegal by the way), he would have had to involve Robbins...the broker. Now don't you suppose that when the CFTC investigated this, they would have been able to detect this? And again, let's assume that he guessed the market direction and was wrong. So now he has to place this in the pool account. But he would have nothing in his own account. LOL!
What's more likely is that your information is just plain wrong. Doesn't change the record. Williams was written up for not publicizing an accurate record, which would have included the results of the pool account. The pool account records were terrible.
If you're going to charge Williams with fraud, then perhaps you ought to cite something a little more factual. Because the CFTC didn't charge him with that.
OldTrader
nicely said, OT. thanks!
- Status
- Not open for further replies.