Kim and Dotard sign a 'commitment'

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

Replies to Tony Stark's, Slartibarfast's, and Here4money posts below:

"Tony Stark, post: 4671531, member: 495092"]Kim and Dotard sign a 'commitment'...They could barely keep a commitment to meet for a few hours
And yet there they are, negotiating. We have Trump Denial Syndrome. Now we have North Korea Negotiation Denial Syndrome, too?


"Slartibartfast, post: 4671535, member: 500061"]OMG have you seen this Rodman Interview?

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/12/politics/dennis-rodman-north-korea-chris-cuomo-cnntv/index.html

Holy moley.. what a... so many words..

He is such a CRYING PUSSY that is why Trump grabbed him. He had to hide out for 30 days!! Oh Lord!

And then he goes on to say he had no idea what he was doing when he first went to NK, he thought he was doing a charity event...

THen he explains Kim is just a big kid.. who thrashed Trump in negotiations mind you..
On the one hand you have said that the document in only an agreement to negotiate but on the other that Trump is getting trashed in negotiations. You may want to edit your narrative for internal consistency.


"Here4money, post: 4671541, member: 496573"]How many artillery long guns did Kim pledge to remove from the DMZ in return? How many inspectors will be let in to monitor nuke disarmament?
Again, negotiations are just beginning and will require multiple visits in the future to finalize. You do realize that is kind of what the agreement to negotiate is about, right?

The Left is, well, left grasping at straws, at best. Trump and the Republicans hold national power and are getting important things done. From reestablishing a sound foundation for the United States economy to negotiating peace treaties to address a technical 75 year war and to reestablishing relations with Russia.

It seems to me, the Left is working the "Negative Nellie" angle on historical events, risking further political erosion. I care about this, because historically, when one side gains too much power, the rights of the other side gets trampled. More than 50% of U.S. voters are typically registered Democrats, thus making the resolution of our concerns a potential issue.

Although this long term registered Democrat is hoping that things continue to go well economically and geopolitically, and will likely support Trump should he seek reelection. I hope the radical, antiAmerican Leftists are flushed out of the Democratic Party.

Perhaps one day, the Democrats will again have more to offer than their "Spokesman" with his one word "counter" to the inevitability of the "Trump Train" coming through with its solid agenda.

The Democrats might eventually decide to focus on social issues for ALL the poor in the United States and on environmental issues in such a way that is not overly burdensome to business. This would address some of the gaps in leadership of the Republicans and success in these issues will be more likely obtainable from a strong economic and financial foundation.

Until then, Choo! Choo! Chugga... Chugga... Chugga....

 

[Slartibartfast]

Replies to Tony Stark's, Slartibarfast's, and Here4money posts below:

"Tony Stark, post: 4671531, member: 495092"]Kim and Dotard sign a 'commitment'...They could barely keep a commitment to meet for a few hours
And yet there they are, negotiating. We have Trump Denial Syndrome. Now we have North Korea Negotiation Denial Syndrome, too?


"Slartibartfast, post: 4671535, member: 500061"]OMG have you seen this Rodman Interview?

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/12/politics/dennis-rodman-north-korea-chris-cuomo-cnntv/index.html

Holy moley.. what a... so many words..

He is such a CRYING PUSSY that is why Trump grabbed him. He had to hide out for 30 days!! Oh Lord!

And then he goes on to say he had no idea what he was doing when he first went to NK, he thought he was doing a charity event...

THen he explains Kim is just a big kid.. who thrashed Trump in negotiations mind you..
On the one hand you have said that the document in only an agreement to negotiate but on the other that Trump is getting trashed in negotiations. You may want to edit your narrative for internal consistency.


"Here4money, post: 4671541, member: 496573"]How many artillery long guns did Kim pledge to remove from the DMZ in return? How many inspectors will be let in to monitor nuke disarmament?
Again, negotiations are just beginning and will require multiple visits in the future to finalize. You do realize that is kind of what the agreement to negotiate is about, right?

The Left is, well, left grasping at straws, at best. Trump and the Republicans hold national power and are getting important things done. From reestablishing a sound foundation for the United States economy to negotiating peace treaties to address a technical 75 year war and to reestablishing relations with Russia.

It seems to me, the Left is working the "Negative Nellie" angle on historical events, risking further political erosion. I care about this, because historically, when one side gains too much power, the rights of the other side gets trampled. More than 50% of U.S. voters are typically registered Democrats, thus making the resolution of our concerns a potential issue.

Although this long term registered Democrat is hoping that things continue to go well economically and geopolitically, and will likely support Trump should he seek reelection. I hope the radical, antiAmerican Leftists are flushed out of the Democratic Party.

Perhaps one day, the Democrats will again have more to offer than their "Spokesman" with his one word "counter" to the inevitability of the "Trump Train" coming through with its solid agenda.

The Democrats might eventually decide to focus on social issues for ALL the poor in the United States and on environmental issues in such a way that is not overly burdensome to business. This would address some of the gaps in leadership of the Republicans and success in these issues will be more likely obtainable from a strong economic and financial foundation.

Until then, Choo! Choo! Chugga... Chugga... Chugga....

Trump got an agreement to negotiate, Kim got a lot more.

You really do grief councilor work for the government?

He got thrashed by a real hard case who has been killing on whim since childhood. When Kimmy came to power there was a slaughter of senior officials not seen since the 50s in NK. And Kim was the youngest of three sons.

You are an embarrassingly innocent thing really, I blame lack of natural predators in Portlandia. Is the chicken local?

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

Trump got an agreement to negotiate, Kim got a lot more.

You really do grief councilor work for the government?

He got thrashed by a real hard case who has been killing on whim since childhood. When Kimmy came to power there was a slaughter of senior officials not seen since the 50s in NK. And Kim was the youngest of three sons.

You are an embarrassingly innocent thing really, I blame lack of natural predators in Portlandia. Is the chicken local?

I thought the context of my grief councilor for the government comment was so outrageous as to not be taken seriously.

Brought up on the streets of New York City in a rough neighborhood.

Innocent or practical? Is it plausible to you the same person who killed many of his people directly and indirectly would be willing to kill outside of his country? We have as a country. A lot. Kim's family has been in power for a long time and will likely remain so in some capacity for the foreseeable future. Kim is who we have to work with and it is better for us to reach a mutually beneficial agreement than to let things continue on the previous trajectory.

South Korea, as well as others, have also pushed for this meeting. There are many interested parties in the outcome of this negotiation. A successful outcome of these negotiations will likely give the United States increased credibility and possible leverage in negotiating other treaties, such as peace and trade treaties with other countries.

The United States, Russia, and China do not have "clean hands" when it comes to lives lost either in and or out of their countries. We have to work with what we have in order to make progress

 

[Cuddles]

 

[Slartibartfast]

In line.

I thought the context of my grief councilor for the government comment was so outrageous as to not be taken seriously.

I think you should look into some communications role also, you capacity to energetically reply at length with little beyond some vague notions would suit many companies or government bodies. It is hard to find energy to reply to you like any good corporate lawyer.

Brought up on the streets of New York City in a rough neighborhood.

Another NYC lad.. Jem and Poiny too, wonder if Tom B will turn out to be from there originally also.

Innocent or practical? Is it plausible to you the same person who killed many of his people directly and indirectly would be willing to kill outside of his country? We have as a country. A lot. Kim's family has been in power for a long time and will likely remain so in some capacity for the foreseeable future. Kim is who we have to work with and it is better for us to reach a mutually beneficial agreement than to let things continue on the previous trajectory.

Innocent (being polite). For the scenario of Kim striking the US or Korea/Japan to pan out, he would have to quite literally become suicidal and want to end it all in a big splash. Yeah, there could be a first but you know, there are jaguars in this country and while technically one could make his way into my bedroom and try and eat me in my sleep.. I don't judge that as a risk. You love to say I don't know xyz or abc but I think.. do some goddam research. People who say but it could happen are like children or neurotics.

South Korea, as well as others, have also pushed for this meeting. There are many interested parties in the outcome of this negotiation. A successful outcome of these negotiations will likely give the United States increased credibility and possible leverage in negotiating other treaties, such as peace and trade treaties with other countries.

Not with Trump at the head and particularly with the Mercers/oligarchy not handled. The US had PLENTY of credibility but because of Trump it now has little.

In trading there is a well known danger to accounts, knows as 'sunken cost' or similar. Trump put the US in the ditch (trustworthiness) so fast it spun heads and now the saps are praying if they stay committed they might recover. Hey, it might.. but he will do it again. And after him will come another who copied and adapted, president Steven Miller/Devon Nunes anyone? (kidding). Like an emotional trader, it will get worse.

The United States, Russia, and China do not have "clean hands" when it comes to lives lost either in and or out of their countries. We have to work with what we have in order to make progress

Or make it a lot worse. Again, so what. Lions and Tigers and Bears! Oh my! fluffy thinking.

 

[Poindexter]

Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November.

And given the size of NK nukes, it would manage to destroy a port at most.

attacking far away from the port or near it could at max cause a damage of ten square kilometers.

I didn't try to minimize, I explained the MAXIMUM damaged they can do if they even manage to get close to the port.

Your posts in this thread are mind boggling in their stupidity and may be the most idiotic ever made on this site.

A port at most? Only ten square kilometers? "MAXIMUM damaged [sic]"? Seriously?

First of all, Americans use miles -- not kilometers -- in casual conversations. You're not one so you don't care. And since you only "know" what you can google and lack the brains to think through ramifications, you don't realize the impacts. So I'll spell a few out.

At minimum any nuclear attack on the US would:

1) Start a nuclear war.
2) Crash world markets.
3) Have long term negative consequences that would make those of 9/11 look like a child's birthday party in comparison.

Nobody said they are impenetrable but they sure are 100% impenetrable by some third world shithole with inferior technology

You're so fucking stupid that you destroyed your own talking point in the same sentence without realizing it. On the one hand, their "inferior technology" is sophisticated enough to make them a nuclear power but on the other, they can't execute a simple smuggling operation?

And there are maritime fleets monitoring for such activity.

Launch how far without a missile?

You don't even know that missiles can be launched from ships?

Since you couldn't do the 4rd grade math to process what "maritime fleets" would have to monitor, I'll help you out:

Given a coastline of 12,000+ miles, every zone with an average width of 83 miles contains one million square miles. What magic sensors do we have that "maritime fleets" can monitor millions of square miles of ocean with, 24/7, to detect a nuclear weapon on board a ship?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November.





Your posts in this thread are mind boggling in their stupidity and may be the most idiotic ever made on this site.

A port at most? Only ten square kilometers? "MAXIMUM damaged [sic]"? Seriously?

First of all, Americans use miles -- not kilometers -- in casual conversations. You're not one so you don't care. And since you only "know" what you can google and lack the brains to think through ramifications, you don't realize the impacts. So I'll spell a few out.

At minimum any nuclear attack on the US would:

1) Start a nuclear war.
2) Crash world markets.
3) Have long term negative consequences that would make those of 9/11 look like a child's birthday party in comparison.


You're so fucking stupid that you destroyed your own talking point in the same sentence without realizing it. On the one hand, their "inferior technology" is sophisticated enough to make them a nuclear power but on the other, they can't execute a simple smuggling operation?



You don't even know that missiles can be launched from ships?

Since you couldn't do the 4rd grade math to process what "maritime fleets" would have to monitor, I'll help you out:

Given a coastline of 12,000+ miles, every zone with an average width of 83 miles contains one million square miles. What magic sensors do we have that "maritime fleets" can monitor millions of square miles of ocean with, 24/7, to detect a nuclear weapon on board a ship?

Says the Russian... Right fist Poindexter?

We know you understood the significance of your nickname, you can't be that innocent.

 

[Poindexter]

Says the Russian... Right fist Poindexter?

View attachment 187213

We know you understood the significance of your nickname, you can't be that innocent.

Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November.

 

[exGOPer]

Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November.

Go fuck yourself pedo lover, welcome to the ignore list.

You don't even know that missiles can be launched from ships?

Since you couldn't do the 4rd grade math to process what "maritime fleets" would have to monitor, I'll help you out:

Given a coastline of 12,000+ miles, every zone with an average width of 83 miles contains one million square miles. What magic sensors do we have that "maritime fleets" can monitor millions of square miles of ocean with, 24/7, to detect a nuclear weapon on board a ship?

Inbred retard said 'fishing vessel' which suddenly became a missile launching ship when he lost the argument.

This is a lesson to all, never try to reason with a conservative, you will get nothing in return other than blatant lies and bullshit. These are baboons pretending to be human.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Why haven't you registered? Foreign trolls like you have no business trying to influence our politics with elections coming up in November.

Fake Jew, fake American.

Russian NYC reform 'Jew' Interestingly my real Jersey Jewish friend tells me his morning that only the Russians vote Republican.

Why don't YOU register as a foreign troll.