Killing each Taliban soldier costs $50 Million

Quote from adadadog:

They make AK47 in street side shops in Pak and Afg.

The only problem is the fact that most towelheads can't shoot them straight.

Ooh rah!!!
 
Quote from candletrader:

... the alliance can bring its boys home asap.
I'm sure our Nobel Peace Prize winning POTUS will get on that right away.
 
Quote from Ghost of Cutten:

That's a myth. The Romans did it all the time for centuries, so did the Brits, the USA did it after WWII in Germany and Japan where there were several years of violent insurgency by reactionary Nazis/Imperial Japanese loyalists.

Hitler was even more effective, he simply killed lots of civilians any time a resistance attack succeeded. Thus, any resistance was futile as it did not remove the occupiers and just led to more of your own people dying. The Afghanistan resistance would end in 3 months if the US did that.

The coalition can either adopt Hitler tactics, or the more lengthy but less brutal tactics of the Roman and British Empires, or it can lose. Simple choice, but the American government and people still haven't realised it, or made up their mind whether they would prefer to win brutally, or lose semi-honourably.

and i can give you many examples throughout history of why and how brutal suppression didnt work.
 
Quote from MohdSalleh:

and i can give you many examples throughout history of why and how brutal suppression didnt work.

American Indians are pretty much gone; It is all relative.
 
Quote from adadadog:

American Indians are pretty much gone; It is all relative.

Not really, they're just running casino operations with tax preferred status.

:D
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

I always thought this is the REAL reason we went into Iraq. Bush was worried about the possibility of facing reelection during a recession, so he fabricated an excuse to deficit-spend on a phony war effort.

His ego and greed have caused America GREAT harm... Terrible a president as he was, he's still not as bad as Odumba. (We probably wouldn't have Odumba now had the country not been so pissed at Bush.. a "backlash against Bush" vote likely being the election-deciding factor.)

Yeah, this gets to the heart of the matter. When you reflect for a moment, just about every election in the past 40 years or so has been a reaction against the previous administration to elect what is perceived to be a radical shift in policy or direction. The end result is that most everyone agrees that the successor is disastrous compared to the predecessor. No small feat for Hopey, when you consider the near unanimous discontent with Bush.
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

...

Osama Bin Laden getting last laugh... one attack and we destroy ourselves financially. :(

That says it all. The terrorists have been very forthcoming about their strategy. It is to ruin the U.S. financially. They have said as much over and over. On 9/11 the terrorists leveraged a few hundred thousand dollars (if that) to an amount yet to be determined, but on the order of ten to the twelve. This is a leveraging up of 7 powers of ten -- 10 million fold!

We, the U.S., have been incredibly obliging. We have now reached the point where they (Al qaeda) don't even have to carry out a threat, just the threat alone is enough to cause us to spend millions more. It is a brilliant strategy. If you are clever enough, you can defeat a great military power, even though your resources are but a minuscule fraction of your enemy's. But your success depends on your enemies cooperation. So far, the United States has cooperated to the nth degree.
 
+1

Just from a pure business perspective.. they certainly got the most bang for their buck. Considering 90%+ were Saudi's and we have proceeded to annihilate their competition. They don't need to do anything other than an occasional threat// We are imploding all by ourselves.

What we fail to realize is every brown skin life we have ruined through collateral damage is a new potential terrorist. Unless we intend to exterminate all these folks.. they live for vengeance.

US has their own little Islamacaust going on here and abroad. You know Iran and the Paki's are next. The Chinese are waiting in the wings and will pounce when we are spread out and vulnerable.

10 years in Afghanistan this tour and what have we accomplished?
At least rape and pillage their mineral wealth to offset some cost. legalize hash and send each taxpayer a ration...

The biggest problem is we wouldn't even know if we won. Nothing is clearly defined... This is not even officially a war.


Quote from piezoe:

That says it all. The terrorists have been very forthcoming about their strategy. It is to ruin the U.S. financially. They have said as much over and over. On 9/11 the terrorists leveraged a few hundred thousand dollars (if that) to an amount yet to be determined, but on the order of ten to the twelve. This is a leveraging up of 7 powers of ten -- 10 million fold!

We, the U.S., have been incredibly obliging. We have now reached the point where they (Al qaeda) don't even have to carry out a threat, just the threat alone is enough to cause us to spend millions more. It is a brilliant strategy. If you are clever enough, you can defeat a great military power, even though your resources are but a minuscule fraction of your enemy's. But your success depends on your enemies cooperation. So far, the United States has cooperated to the nth degree.
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

I always thought this is the REAL reason we went into Iraq. Bush was worried about the possibility of facing reelection during a recession, so he fabricated an excuse to deficit-spend on a phony war effort.

His ego and greed have caused America GREAT harm... Terrible a president as he was, he's still not as bad as Odumba. (We probably wouldn't have Odumba now had the country not been so pissed at Bush.. a "backlash against Bush" vote likely being the election-deciding factor.)


the repubicans nominated a clueless old man. the idiotic religious wing of the party could not stomach a mormon ie romney a businessman who was the last individual to run an olympics with a surplus who would have made a superb president.

Instead the US got an anti business anti market president who does not even believe in the US but in some world government .
 
Back
Top