Quote from Ghost of Cutten:
That's a myth. The Romans did it all the time for centuries, so did the Brits, the USA did it after WWII in Germany and Japan where there were several years of violent insurgency by reactionary Nazis/Imperial Japanese loyalists.
Hitler was even more effective, he simply killed lots of civilians any time a resistance attack succeeded. Thus, any resistance was futile as it did not remove the occupiers and just led to more of your own people dying. The Afghanistan resistance would end in 3 months if the US did that.
The coalition can either adopt Hitler tactics, or the more lengthy but less brutal tactics of the Roman and British Empires, or it can lose. Simple choice, but the American government and people still haven't realised it, or made up their mind whether they would prefer to win brutally, or lose semi-honourably.
Quote from Scataphagos:
I always thought this is the REAL reason we went into Iraq. Bush was worried about the possibility of facing reelection during a recession, so he fabricated an excuse to deficit-spend on a phony war effort.
His ego and greed have caused America GREAT harm... Terrible a president as he was, he's still not as bad as Odumba. (We probably wouldn't have Odumba now had the country not been so pissed at Bush.. a "backlash against Bush" vote likely being the election-deciding factor.)
Quote from Scataphagos:
...
Osama Bin Laden getting last laugh... one attack and we destroy ourselves financially.![]()
Quote from piezoe:
That says it all. The terrorists have been very forthcoming about their strategy. It is to ruin the U.S. financially. They have said as much over and over. On 9/11 the terrorists leveraged a few hundred thousand dollars (if that) to an amount yet to be determined, but on the order of ten to the twelve. This is a leveraging up of 7 powers of ten -- 10 million fold!
We, the U.S., have been incredibly obliging. We have now reached the point where they (Al qaeda) don't even have to carry out a threat, just the threat alone is enough to cause us to spend millions more. It is a brilliant strategy. If you are clever enough, you can defeat a great military power, even though your resources are but a minuscule fraction of your enemy's. But your success depends on your enemies cooperation. So far, the United States has cooperated to the nth degree.
Quote from Scataphagos:
I always thought this is the REAL reason we went into Iraq. Bush was worried about the possibility of facing reelection during a recession, so he fabricated an excuse to deficit-spend on a phony war effort.
His ego and greed have caused America GREAT harm... Terrible a president as he was, he's still not as bad as Odumba. (We probably wouldn't have Odumba now had the country not been so pissed at Bush.. a "backlash against Bush" vote likely being the election-deciding factor.)