Why is it liberals take great zeal in criticizing others and then cry like little bitches when it's thrown back In their face ?
Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Why is it liberals take great zeal in criticizing others and then cry like little bitches when it's thrown back In their face ?
Trump criticized a member of a certified PC victim group. That is not allowed.
Hillary only accused a white woman of lying. Big difference.
Hillary only accused a white woman of lying. Big difference.
No, she did not.
Glad you and Rip Van Winkle awoke from your extended nap..Looks like it took you 2 bro's about 30 yrs to figure this out..Bernie could have used your support.
He said, "I'd like to hear what she has to say."
Is that the "attack" you are attacking about?
For argument, let's call it an aspersion on something. It's an aspersion on the man, who dominates his wife, even on a national stage...making her wear head covering, makes her stand low, ignores her, hogs the spotlight, and subjects her to an elbow in the face as he points fingers scolding Trump. It's an aspersion on loud mouthed Muslim patriarchy (inequality) and it's subjugation of women and how that's OK, as long as it's at a national Democratic convention.
So to make this about the woman is unmanly.
Turns out the dude is a Sharia shilling chauvinist and Trump was right.
Last edited:
"Trump also questioned why Khan’s wife, Ghazala, did not speak on stage, despite the fact that she sat for an interview with MSNBC the following day.
“His wife, if you look at his wife, she was standing there. She had nothing to say. She probably, maybe she wasn’t allowed to have anything to say,” he said. “You tell me, but plenty of people have written that. She was extremely quiet and it looked like she had nothing to say.”
We have one legit muslim army war hero. I am sure there are many others.
We don't hear anything about the flip side however, the many jihadists who infiltrated our armed services and murdered fellow soldiers. It's not just afghanis that our guys are forced to work beside, even though they pose a grave threat. ps. Ever notice that it's never the top brass who get killed in these attacks? Only lower level guys.
This article goes into the muslim traitor attacks. http://www.vdare.com/articles/musli...ctims-parents-get-to-speak-at-any-conventions
From the article:
....
Don’t take my word for it. Just re-read the ignored warnings issued by Muslim soldier Nidal Hasan, the vengeful mass murderer who gunned down 13 service members—including a pregnant private first class who lost her life and her child—and wounded more than 30 others at Fort Hood in 2009.
Two years before his rampage, while a senior-year medical school resident in psychology, U.S. Army Major Hasan delivered a 50-slide PowerPoint presentation [PDF] to classmates and military superiors at Walter Reed. It was titled “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Mu
slims in the U.S. Military.” Quoting chapter and verse, Hasan illuminated “what the Koran inculcates in the minds of Muslims and the potential implications this may have for the U.S. military.”
Hasan cited the Verse of the Sword (“I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah”), explained “offensive” and “defensive” jihad and summarized the concept of “abrogation”—in which warring verses of the Quran trumped “peaceful verses.”
... .
Cowed military superiors ignored the presentation, just as they had dismissed complaints from fellow students who noted Hasan’s exaltation of Sharia over the Constitution and support for suicide bombings.
“Adverse events” was Hasan’s euphemism for bloody
jihad attacks and betrayals by Muslim soldiers against their own fellow U.S. soldiers. He included a case I’ve never forgotten: Traitor Hasan Akbar, the 326th Engineer Battalion Muslim-American soldier who lobbed stolen hand grenades and shot his M-4 automatic rifle into three tents filled with sleeping commanding officers at the 101st Airborne Division’s 1st Brigade operations center in Kuwait in 2003.
Capt. Christopher Seifert, 27, and Maj. Gregory Stone, 40, died during the fragging. Fourteen others suffered wounds from grenade shrapnel.
Willful blindness to a Muslim-American soldier’s fundamental internal conflict of loyalties led to those murders and injuries. Despite several incidents of insubordination and prior invocation of his Islamic beliefs to skip out of the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Akbar’s superiors sent him to Kuwait—and put him in charge of clearing land mines.
A decade later, in 2013, former Muslim-American Navy veteran Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif and an accomplice were convicted of plotting to kill officers and employees at a Seattle military recruiting center. The would-be killers wanted to retaliate against “the American military presence in the Middle East” and to prevent our troops “from going to Islamic lands and killing Muslims.” The co-conspirators cited Nidal Hasan’s Fort Hood attack as inspiration.
In March, U.S. Air Force vet and avionics weapons systems expert Ta
irod Nathan Webster Pugh, who declared himself a “Mujahid,” was convicted of providing material support to ISIS. Last spring, 22-year-old Army National Guard specialist Hasan Edmonds was arrested on his way overseas to join the Islamic State. He had plotted attacks on his Illinois National Guard Armory, police stations and courts.
Over the years, I’ve reported on many more of Allah’s soldiers in American uniforms, including:
This is not “Islamophobia.” This is fact: Not all U.S. Muslim soldiers are equal. To deny the deadly risk is to enable it.
We don't hear anything about the flip side however, the many jihadists who infiltrated our armed services and murdered fellow soldiers. It's not just afghanis that our guys are forced to work beside, even though they pose a grave threat. ps. Ever notice that it's never the top brass who get killed in these attacks? Only lower level guys.
This article goes into the muslim traitor attacks. http://www.vdare.com/articles/musli...ctims-parents-get-to-speak-at-any-conventions
From the article:
....
Don’t take my word for it. Just re-read the ignored warnings issued by Muslim soldier Nidal Hasan, the vengeful mass murderer who gunned down 13 service members—including a pregnant private first class who lost her life and her child—and wounded more than 30 others at Fort Hood in 2009.
Two years before his rampage, while a senior-year medical school resident in psychology, U.S. Army Major Hasan delivered a 50-slide PowerPoint presentation [PDF] to classmates and military superiors at Walter Reed. It was titled “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Mu
Hasan cited the Verse of the Sword (“I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah”), explained “offensive” and “defensive” jihad and summarized the concept of “abrogation”—in which warring verses of the Quran trumped “peaceful verses.”
... .
Cowed military superiors ignored the presentation, just as they had dismissed complaints from fellow students who noted Hasan’s exaltation of Sharia over the Constitution and support for suicide bombings.
“Adverse events” was Hasan’s euphemism for bloody
Capt. Christopher Seifert, 27, and Maj. Gregory Stone, 40, died during the fragging. Fourteen others suffered wounds from grenade shrapnel.
Willful blindness to a Muslim-American soldier’s fundamental internal conflict of loyalties led to those murders and injuries. Despite several incidents of insubordination and prior invocation of his Islamic beliefs to skip out of the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Akbar’s superiors sent him to Kuwait—and put him in charge of clearing land mines.
A decade later, in 2013, former Muslim-American Navy veteran Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif and an accomplice were convicted of plotting to kill officers and employees at a Seattle military recruiting center. The would-be killers wanted to retaliate against “the American military presence in the Middle East” and to prevent our troops “from going to Islamic lands and killing Muslims.” The co-conspirators cited Nidal Hasan’s Fort Hood attack as inspiration.
In March, U.S. Air Force vet and avionics weapons systems expert Ta
Over the years, I’ve reported on many more of Allah’s soldiers in American uniforms, including:
- Army soldier Ali Mohamed, who pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama bin Laden to “attack any Western target in the Middle East” and admitted his role in the 1998 African embassy bombings.
- Naval reservist Semi Osman, linked to a terrorist training camp in Oregon.
- Army reservist Jeffrey Leon Battle, who pleaded guilty to conspiring to levy war against the United States.
- Navy sailor Hassan Abu-Jihaad, convicted on espionage and material terrorism support charges after serving aboard the USS Benfold and sharing classified information with al-Qaida financiers, including U.S. ship movements prior to the USS Cole bombing in Yemen.
- US. Army Private First Class Naser Jason Abdo, who plotted to kill his fellow soldiers to “get even” with the military and strike at kafirs (non-Muslims).
This is not “Islamophobia.” This is fact: Not all U.S. Muslim soldiers are equal. To deny the deadly risk is to enable it.
Right, so where is the attack?
It's still an aspersion on the Sharia shilling chauvinist.
The chauvinist could have explained, on the DNC stage, why his woman was standing low, with a headscarf, unable or unwilling to say anything...before he raised his finger (elbow in her face) in order to scold Trump for not reading the Constitution. But he was too chauvinistic to explain it till way later when he came up with a plausible excuse.
It baffles me how the dems can be the party of militant, in your face feminism, and push every gay agenda item, yet they champion people who treat women like livestock and think gays should be executed. And the feminists and gays continue to support them. So do the jews, even after Obama and Clinton sold out Israel and support people who advocate killing jews like rabid dogs.
We have muslims here and they should be treated as we treat eveyone else. Bringing in more, particularly from conflict areas, is madness however.
How much earlier do you think you figured each part of it out? Its easy to be the technician after the fact, its far tougher making the calls before the market moves? But, there is no doubt a few people on this site knew it here before I did.
The republican party was not selling out our votes so obviously in the past.
Clinton caved to some of the voter's agenda.
Bush was a mixture.
The agenda and the complete sellout became clear when McConnell and Boehner worked to further the establishment's agenda instead of what they promised voters.
Could we have seen it sooner... sure... Some people figure it out earlier in Bush's term some figured it out a little bit later.
But, I think it probably took a while to get all the cronies on board with the agenda to screw the voters and tax payers as well.
It also took time to convert all the democrats from union/worker pols to silicon valley voting import cheap labor / non single payer voters as well.
The republican party was not selling out our votes so obviously in the past.
Clinton caved to some of the voter's agenda.
Bush was a mixture.
The agenda and the complete sellout became clear when McConnell and Boehner worked to further the establishment's agenda instead of what they promised voters.
Could we have seen it sooner... sure... Some people figure it out earlier in Bush's term some figured it out a little bit later.
But, I think it probably took a while to get all the cronies on board with the agenda to screw the voters and tax payers as well.
It also took time to convert all the democrats from union/worker pols to silicon valley voting import cheap labor / non single payer voters as well.
Last edited: