I've read his website, I've read his writings (on brietbart), and I've looked at the EB5 visa program. You're wrong about it all. There's nothing there.
I will acknowledge you stating that Drumpf's attacks on Ms. Khan were unmanly, I agree.
Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
I will acknowledge you stating that Drumpf's attacks on Ms. Khan were unmanly, I agree.
As a rule, muslims should be treated like christians (we should not capitalize the first letter in their self-identity) until we find out they actually read, and care about, the koran. Like many christians, many muslims are oblivious to the advocacy of divine violence buried deep in the annals of their revered rhetoric (holy books). Many so-called muslims, like christians, are psychological captives of psychological warfare, living a kind of Stockholm Syndrome life, for fear of a god that can read (and log a database of) every thought they think. Many muslims, like christians, either don't read what's in their revered rhetoric, or reading it, don't connect the dots on what it implies.
However, based on the content of christian chauvinistic xenophobic literature compared to muslim chauvinistic xenophobic literature, christian behavior is more predictable. You can't predict what a muslim will do when he actually delves into his preferred revered rhetoric.
Nope.
Muslim immigrants are being forced down our Western throats... BECAUSE THEY ARE EXPECTED TO AND DESIRED TO TERRORIZE, MURDER, RAPE, AND CAUSE GENERAL CHAOS! (It's well known what passes for "culture" for them is incompatible with Western culture.) After they've done enough of that, the "powers" will have the "excuse" they then need to do what they've wanted to do all along.
It's all intentional. IOW... The cabal supporting muslim infestion of the West... BROUGHT THEM HERE SPECIFICALLY TO RAPE OUR WOMEN AND CHILDREN... AND TO MURDER AS MANY OF US AS THEY CAN!! AND HILLARY WANTS TO INCREASE OUR MUSLIM IMMIGRATIONS BY 500%! WTF??
Obama, Hillary, Merkel, Hollande, US Congress.. and others are all "in on it".
Last edited:
So here is another example of how you and your preferred sources of rhetoric twist things.
Trump cast aspersions on a man, not a woman.
I said that twisting it to characterize an attack on Khan's woman was unmanly.
Likewise, characterizing my point as an acknowledgment of a Trump aspersion as unmanly...is unmanly.
See, there are pros, and there are cons.
I'm not talking about Khan's/Con's EB5 money-making method of cashing in on rich migrants.
Talking about Khan's/Con's known writings prioritizing the Sharia over other preferred rhetorical writings by Islamic authors, and by inference, Sharia's priority over the US Constitution.
Who, favoring the Sharia, isn't a chauvinist, or a captive of male chauvinism?
Wow, talk about twisting! What a goofus.
Reality, he advocated for Sharia first. By some definitions of treason that is treason. He should be opposed. I thought what Trump did was a bad political move. But, this Khan guy is a Sharia first guy. I have trouble calling him out because his son sacrificed his life for the country... but his thoughts of Sharia first should be opposed.
Mr. Khan says he took the site down because he feared it would be attacked, and because he was getting very ugly mail. Really? On the internet, hate mail? In 2016??
Only thing twisted here is the sharia (doesn't deserve to be capitalized)...and the preferred revered rhetoric of jews and christians (sometimes called the "old testament" by christians).
Based on the way Khan/Con treated his woman on stage, Trump sensed that the man was probably a male supremacist influenced by the sharia.
Trump has never treated a woman on stage like that.
You may as well twist it further, making Trump's aspersion on the supremacist an attack on the dead hero son.
I would like to hear what the dead son would have to say...but was drowned out by the elbow, the finger, and the mouth of the sharia supremacist.
Last edited: