When the SCOTUS is in somebody's pocket, what chance do freedom, liberty and rule of law have?
Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate - 2004 article
- Thread starter Savant
- Start date
When the SCOTUS is in somebody's pocket, what chance do freedom, liberty and rule of law have?
1. Its very hard to distinguish pompous from unyielding and correct.
When the losing side in the debate calls the winning side pompous... it means 100% victory. Being unyielding when you are corrrect is sometimes your duty as an American.
I am sure you have experienced that scenario before. I suspect you have even been called pompous. Consider it a compliment when the debate is about national values.
2. Reagan was not perfect his wife was into astrology, iran contra seems to have been a real concern... but cutting taxes raised revenue... that was not voodoo it is proven in the tax receipts.
Your pomposity is assuming facts not in evidence, i.e. winners/losers of a message board debates.
I've said this before, apparently it bears repeating:
There are no winners in message board debates...although typical losers (in general) proclaim themselves winners of on line message board debates.
Think about it. You have a mock trial with no judge, with no jury. One side proclaims themselves the winner...ridiculous.
Raising taxes does raise revenue, fact.
Cutting raises taxes raises revenue? Not true, never proved to be true. It is a spurious conclusion. Bush's tax cuts did not trickle down into job creation.
You are blinded by an unproved ideology when it comes to Reagan.
I've said this before, apparently it bears repeating:
There are no winners in message board debates...although typical losers (in general) proclaim themselves winners of on line message board debates.
Think about it. You have a mock trial with no judge, with no jury. One side proclaims themselves the winner...ridiculous.
Raising taxes does raise revenue, fact.
Cutting raises taxes raises revenue? Not true, never proved to be true. It is a spurious conclusion. Bush's tax cuts did not trickle down into job creation.
You are blinded by an unproved ideology when it comes to Reagan.
What the stupid birthers should realize, that when even the Rep leadership stops questioning Berry's birth, then probably there is nothing in it. And after that it is just a bad distraction dividing the "faithful" and weakening the Reps chances.
Long live the birther movement, it gives Obi 4 more years....
Oh yeah and jem, let's suppose the NBC definition would go to the Supreme Court. Do you really think they would DARE to make such a definition that EXCLUDES Obama?? That would cause a constitutional crises. So if it goes there, they just going to say the same what we already mean by it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb7cm00a7cA
Bachmann gets the evidence...
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding....
Long live the birther movement, it gives Obi 4 more years....
Oh yeah and jem, let's suppose the NBC definition would go to the Supreme Court. Do you really think they would DARE to make such a definition that EXCLUDES Obama?? That would cause a constitutional crises. So if it goes there, they just going to say the same what we already mean by it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb7cm00a7cA
Bachmann gets the evidence...
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding....
Do you know what a spurious conclusion is?