He will be hailed a hero in prison. He’s not going to prison.
Kenosha Shooting was self-defense
- Thread starter Daxtrader
- Start date
I don't see how this statue applies to this case.
you are sadly misinformed.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/kenosha-shooting-was-self-defense.349303/page-3#post-5189126
breaking curfew
crossing state boundaries to engage in mayhem
crossing weapons as a minor
discharging weapons in public
no need to tack on the homicide bits
you are sadly misinformed.
The beginning of this video states the reason the group he was with was there.
inform yourself, ready fire aim-ster
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/kenosha-shooting-was-self-defense.349303/page-3#post-5189126
Yet you have the police thanking him for being there and giving him water.
If the police believe he and his companions were breaking any laws then the police would have asked them to stop or arrested them.
we've been saying the police are thugs and criminals for a while. It's why over 80% vote for the criminal in office.
If I'm interpreting this correctly, actively committing a crime doesn't nullify the entire self defense law. It just nullifies the (ar) portion of the law which addresses presumption that force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm during a break in. I don't believe that this portion of the law would even apply to an altercation that occurs on the street.
https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/2014/chapter-939/section-939.48
939.48 Self-defense and defense of others.
939.48(1)(1) A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.
939.48(1m)(1m)
939.48(1m)(a)(a) In this subsection:
939.48(1m)(a)1.1. "Dwelling" has the meaning given in s. 895.07 (1) (h).
939.48(1m)(a)2.2. "Place of business" means a business that the actor owns or operates.
939.48(1m)(ar) If an actor intentionally used force that was intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm, the court may not consider whether the actor had an opportunity to flee or retreat before he or she used force and shall presume that the actor reasonably believed that the force was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself if the actor makes such a claim under sub. (1) and either of the following applies:
939.48(1m)(ar)1.1. The person against whom the force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering the actor's dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business, the actor was present in the dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business, and the actor knew or reasonably believed that an unlawful and forcible entry was occurring.
939.48(1m)(ar)2.2. The person against whom the force was used was in the actor's dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business after unlawfully and forcibly entering it, the actor was present in the dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business, and the actor knew or reasonably believed that the person had unlawfully and forcibly entered the dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business.
939.48(1m)(b) The presumption described in par. (ar) does not apply if any of the following applies:
939.48(1m)(b)1.1. The actor was engaged in a criminal activity or was using his or her dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business to further a criminal activity at the time.
Self defense, his life was in danger.
Ultimate Video Analysis ----> Kenosha Riot Shooting - *Slo-Mo Frame-By-Frame @ 14m:50s
https://banned.video/watch?id=5f46f5e6838dfb0597d32ed4