Kellyanne violates the Hatch Act.

I'd say allegedly, under investigation but it is far far too blatant to be coy about.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nways-comments-about-alabama-senate-race.html

"
The incident in question involves an appearance by Conway on Fox News' “Fox & Friends.” Conway touted President Trump’s tax plan before taking aim at Jones.

“Doug Jones in Alabama, folks, don’t be fooled,” she said. “He’ll be a vote against tax cuts. He’s weak on crime, weak on borders. He’s strong on raising your taxes. He’s terrible for property owners. And Doug Jones is a doctrinaire liberal which is why he’s not saying anything and the media are trying to boost him.”

“Fox & Friends” host Brian Kilmeade asked Conway, “So vote Roy Moore?”

Conway replied, “I’m telling you that we want the votes in the Senate to get this tax bill through.”

Shaub, who left his ethics post earlier this year, took issue with Conway’s comments.

“She’s standing in front of the White House. It seems pretty clear she was appearing in her official capacity when she advocated against a candidate,” Shaub tweeted.

"
 
I would like to know how the hatch act applies to her and what she said.

its complicated... I would like to see the argument.

I see a lot of b.s about what the law is supposed to mean.
I would like to see someone make an argument the way an attorney would.

Cite the exact part of the act she violated.
Then apply that law to Conway.





I'd say allegedly, under investigation but it is far far too blatant to be coy about.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nways-comments-about-alabama-senate-race.html

"
The incident in question involves an appearance by Conway on Fox News' “Fox & Friends.” Conway touted President Trump’s tax plan before taking aim at Jones.

“Doug Jones in Alabama, folks, don’t be fooled,” she said. “He’ll be a vote against tax cuts. He’s weak on crime, weak on borders. He’s strong on raising your taxes. He’s terrible for property owners. And Doug Jones is a doctrinaire liberal which is why he’s not saying anything and the media are trying to boost him.”

“Fox & Friends” host Brian Kilmeade asked Conway, “So vote Roy Moore?”

Conway replied, “I’m telling you that we want the votes in the Senate to get this tax bill through.”

Shaub, who left his ethics post earlier this year, took issue with Conway’s comments.

“She’s standing in front of the White House. It seems pretty clear she was appearing in her official capacity when she advocated against a candidate,” Shaub tweeted.

"
 
Last edited:
i very quickly noticed that in court... when an attorney said clearly or obviously... a judge or opposing attorney would say... if it is so clear cite the statute or case law.

In this case we see the argument... in that article...
"Based on this obvious violation of the Hatch Act"


I can't help but think that most judges would not accept that argument.
Most lawyers would suggest they have time... pull out the case the law...
and most readers would not know the Hatch act.

So what is so "obvious".
So again... I ask... please show us how it is so obvious?

By the way... I am not arguing its not. I am simply stating if it were obvious it should be easy to explain.





It is not that complicated.

Trump might be immune, she is not but with Kerner leading the OSC :)

The argument is fairly well covered here.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ellyanne-conway-hatch-act-20171128-story.html
 
i very quickly noticed that in court... when an attorney said clearly or obviously... a judge or opposing attorney would say... if it is so clear cite the statute or case law.

In this case we see the argument... in that article...
"Based on this obvious violation of the Hatch Act"


I can't help but think that most judges would not accept that argument.
Most lawyers would suggest they have time... pull out the case the law...
and most readers would not know the Hatch act.

So what is so "obvious".
So again... I ask... please show us how it is so obvious?

By the way... I am not arguing its not. I am simply stating if it were obvious it should be easy to explain.

I can't be bothered Jem. She is a public servant and was standing in front of the White House.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nways-comments-about-alabama-senate-race.html
 
Last edited:
In the DNC, when your husband is a serial rapist and you open a 9 figure Slush Fund and call it a Foundation you get to run for President TWICE!

Conway has already been admonished once for her antics in regard to the Hatch Act. This is the second time. If this were a democrat in office you would be wanting her fired.

Trump has plenty of problems related to sexual assault and using his charity as a slush fund. So now what does your “what about” argument amount to?
 
Back
Top