Kavanaugh accuser goes public

[TreeFrogTrader]

Luckily, the media never picked up the story, only Breitbart seems to have. I'm sure it was vetted as BS by legitimate outlets, just like I'm sure multiple other were vetted.

The fact that "your" media did not pick it up confirms that the referral happened.

Try googling up the exact letters that grassly wrote in making the referrals and the allegations therein and come back and tell us those referral charges never happened- just because Salon and Huffpo did not report it.

You are in a total tard trance.

If you counter with all sorts of better understanding of what actually happened, as has been the tard position right along, then I say fine. Let em work it out at trial. Right now, the bitches are in serious jeopardy of being indicted so give them all your hugs and support and see if that makes it go away.

 

[Cuddles]

Yes her claims were. Anyone who believes her is a partisan hack..... even MSNBC destroyed her.....

Avenatti is currently looking at being indicted it was that bad....... So to "one off" this one as a mistake is just silly, the media systematically tried to destroy Kavanaugh with dubious allegations, and then they act indignant when Trump accurately calls them "the enemy of the people."

As a conservative/libertarian, how else should i percieve it when NBC, a so called "Mainstream" news source, is intentionally pumping propaganda?

You can choose to believe Swetnicks story was thin, I do. But if you want to debunk her (which is what you're accusing NBC of refusing to do), don't expect them to use flip flopping sources. That's my argument.

Cliff notes to all of this:
1. Swetnick claimed to have knowledge of Kavanaugh spiking drinks/being aggressive (read, she didn't claim witnessing).
2. Mnbc asked to clarify....she said she was told by a confidant that spiking happened.
3. So called witness (at least one of them) can't get her story straight on such claims.
4. Grassley out for Brownie points as if this "investigation" is ever going to go anywhere.

 

[elderado]

Luckily, the media never picked up the story, only Breitbart seems to have. I'm sure it was vetted as BS by legitimate outlets, just like I'm sure multiple other were vetted.

Put down the crackpipe and wise up. The source isn't a "media" outlet.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/im...ighton Referral) with redacted enclosures.pdf

 

[Poindexter]

Luckily, the media never picked up the story, only Breitbart seems to have. I'm sure it was vetted as BS by legitimate outlets, just like I'm sure multiple other were vetted.

Because the "mainstream media" has become the propaganda arm of the demrat party.

 

[Max E.]

You can choose to believe Swetnicks story was thin, I do. But if you want to debunk her (which is what you're accusing NBC of refusing to do), don't expect them to use flip flopping sources. That's my argument.

Cliff notes to all of this:
1. Swetnick claimed to have knowledge of Kavanaugh spiking drinks/being aggressive (read, she didn't claim witnessing).
2. Mnbc asked to clarify....she said she was told by a confidant that spiking happened.
3. So called witness (at least one of them) can't get her story straight on such claims.
4. Grassley out for Brownie points as if this "investigation" is ever going to go anywhere.

She specifically claimed she had witnessed kavanaugh spiking the punch, and Avenatti's letter twisted the words to make it appear Kavanaugh was participating in routine gang rapes...... then the story changed to him "standing around the punch that had been spiked" Its is obviously a joke, anyone who still believes this is an idiot, even MSNBC doesnt buy into the bullshit anymore.

Its a fucking joke, its so bad that even MSNBC wrecked her.

 

[Cuddles]

She specifically claimed she had witnessed kavanaugh spiking the punch, and Avenatti's letter twisted the words to make it appear Kavanaugh was participating in routine gang rapes...... then the story changed to him "standing around the punch that had been spiked" Its is obviously a joke, anyone who still believes this is an idiot, even MSNBC doesnt buy into the bullshit anymore.

Its a fucking joke, its so bad that even MSNBC wrecked her.

I read the declaration, if you couldn't parse the lawyer speak, I don't know what to tell you.

 

[wildchild]

I read the declaration, if you couldn't parse the lawyer speak, I don't know what to tell you.

You are still on Kavanaugh? Your people presented a bunch of bogus claims that had no evidence and the Senate acted accordingly and confirmed him. Kavanaugh will be on the Supreme Court until he retires or dies. Deal with it.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

I read the declaration, if you couldn't parse the lawyer speak, I don't know what to tell you.
View attachment 194201

As I said earlier, if you have zippy things to say, good. Let em work it out at trial.

Here is a question for you, so start crab walking sideways in advance:

Put aside whether Kavanaugh raped anyone. Continue to assume that he did if that helps you in your trance state.

Also, put aside whether Slutnick lied or not even though she clearly did, but if it helps you to maintain your trance state assume she is total victim and never told a lie to anyone, ever, anywhere.

Now let's come to the other bimbo. The one who has recanted, and stated on the record that she made the whole frigging thing up, has never seen kavanaugh, and said she did it because she was angry.

So what do you want to do with that one? You want to see her prosecuted or not?
We will let the prosecutors work on slutnick's guilt or innocence, but what do you want to do with the one who has already confessed to the crime of making a false accusation?

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

As I said earlier, if you have zippy things to say, good. Let em work it out at trial.

Here is a question for you, so start crab walking sideways in advance:

Put aside whether Kavanaugh raped anyone. Continue to assume that he did if that helps you in your trance state.

Also, put aside whether Slutnick lied or not even though she clearly did, but if it helps you to maintain your trance state assume she is total victim and never told a lie to anyone, ever, anywhere.

Now let's come to the other bimbo. The one who has recanted, and stated on the record that she made the whole frigging thing up, has never seen kavanaugh, and said she did it because she was angry.

So what do you want to do with that one? You want to see her prosecuted or not?
We will let the prosecutors work on slutnick's guilt or innocence, but what do you want to do with the one who has already confessed to the crime of making a false accusation?

Here4Richter,


White Boy, how you coming along with your answer to the question I asked you in the above post?

 

[elderado]

White Boy Richter is still waiting for a "legitimate news outlet" to report on the story, you know, like Gawker.