Kavanaugh accuser goes public

[Max E.]

I'm saying the media didn't pick up this lady's story because it was vetted as BS, not that they didn't pick up the story of her getting hammered for making up BS. I never saw this lady's claims anywhere on the news, so her claims were a non-issue to Kavanaugh's potential confirmation as far as I'm concerned.

Swetnick's other witness has been all over the place...first she confims, then denies, then confirms again. Just read the NBC story. They knew the story was bullshit, and they had evidence, and they sat on it till after he had been confirmed.

Diverting committee's resources is a bunch of bunk...they were busy looking for a bar on which to celebrate after they had a nomination.

NBC also held off on a story till after Kavanaughs confirmation, that destroyed Swetnicks claim, what reason would they have for that other than the fact that they are operating as an arm of the democratic party?

This would have been a bombshell if NBC released it in real time.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...t-avenatti-claims-regarding-kavanaugh-n924596


In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a “ploy,” and a “tactic.” She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

 

[Cuddles]

So 2 of the 4 women have been referred for indictment. Avenatti has been referred for indictment. One women who is referred for indictment admitted that she completed lied her a$$ off. A third women is under investigation to be referred for indictment. Obviously Christine Blasey Ford lied about many things including the extra front door of her house, etc. - she needs to be referred for indictment as well rather than collecting nearly a million dollars from GoFundMe.

Reads just like those "voting violators" referrals for prosecution that never go anywhere.

 

[Cuddles]

NBC also held off on a story till after Kavanaughs confirmation, that destroyed Swetnicks claim, what reason would they have for that other than the fact that they are operating as an arm of the democratic party?

This would have been a bombshell if NBC released it in real time.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...t-avenatti-claims-regarding-kavanaugh-n924596


In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a “ploy,” and a “tactic.” She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Like I said, if you read the story, the lady is all over the place...first confirming, then denying, then confirming, then denying. this isn't Breitbart, they're not going to report on someone who keeps changing her story.

 

[Max E.]

So 2 of the 4 women have been referred for indictment. Avenatti has been referred for indictment. One women who is referred for indictment admitted that she completed lied her a$$ off. A third women is under investigation to be referred for indictment. Obviously Christine Blasey Ford lied about many things including the extra front door of her house, etc. - she needs to be referred for indictment as well rather than collecting nearly a million dollars from GoFundMe.

Yeah but we need to believe women no matter what, under any circumstance.

 

[gwb-trading]

Reads just like those "voting violators" referrals for prosecution that never go anywhere.

As of August 24th most have been indicted by the grand jury. Several have already pleaded guilty in deals.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ednc/pr/nineteen-foreign-nationals-charged-voting-2016-election

 

[Cuddles]

As of August 24th most have been indicted by the grand jury. Several have already pleaded guilty in deals.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ednc/pr/nineteen-foreign-nationals-charged-voting-2016-election

you have a problem with reading comprehension it appears

 

[Max E.]

Like I said, if you read the story, the lady is all over the place...first confirming, then denying, then confirming, then denying. this isn't Breitbart, they're not going to report on someone who keeps changing her story.

If she was all over the place, then its a huge story, because the accuser is a fucking nut job......Swetnicks claims got destroyed even on MSNBC....... what does that say for the credibility of the accusations?

Why did NBC sit on the story?

 

[gwb-trading]

you have a problem with reading comprehension it appears

Are you denying these people who voted illegally were indicted by a grand jury?

 

[Cuddles]

If she was all over the place, then its a huge story, because the accuser is a fucking nut job......Swetnicks claims got destroyed even on MSNBC....... what does that say for the credibility of the accusations?

Why did NBC sit on the story?

No, Swetnick was not all over the place, so her claims were not in "Jeopardy".. Just read the god damn story man. The witness that "destroyed" Swetnick's story was all over the place, so it'd be irresponsible for NBC to report on her.

Are you denying these people who voted illegally were indicted by a grand jury?

No, are you denying the rate of conviction for "voting violations" is high in comparison to referrals?

 

[Max E.]

No, Swetnick was not all over the place, so her claims were not in "Jeopardy".. Just read the god damn story man.

Yes her claims were. Anyone who believes her is a partisan hack..... even MSNBC destroyed her.....

Avenatti is currently looking at being indicted it was that bad....... So to "one off" this one as a mistake is just silly, the media systematically tried to destroy Kavanaugh with dubious allegations, and then they act indignant when Trump accurately calls them "the enemy of the people."

As a conservative/libertarian, how else should i percieve it when NBC, a so called "Mainstream" news source, is intentionally pumping propaganda?