Kavanaugh accuser goes public

[Max E.]

Put on your Q Anon t-shirt and MAGA hat and move on. ride your red wave.

Or you could read what i said...... consider the information........ think about it...... and put up a legitimate argument........

In other words present a credible argument.

I couldnt care less either way, other than taxes, it doesnt effect me.... look up why i quit posting here.......

Arguing on ET is an excercise in futility, but if you want to deal in "reality" i could give you lots of info, its not "Always" on your side though, sorry man, this is one of those cases.

 

[constitutionman]

Or you could read what i said...... consider the information........ think about it...... and put up a legitimate argument........

In other words present a credible argument.

I couldnt care less either way, other than taxes, it doesnt effect me.... look up why i quit posting here.......

Arguing on ET is an excercise in futility, but if you want to deal in "reality" i could give you lots of info, its not "Always" on your side though, sorry man, this is one of those cases.

I would take the word of a woman who has been a sexual assault victim over a word of a man who is willing to take the right of every woman to have a choice cause he believes in some BS fairy tale any day.

 

[DTB2]

I would take the word of a woman who has been a sexual assault victim over a word of a man who is willing to take the right of every woman to have a choice cause he believes in some BS fairy tale any day.

Where has this been established? Accusations are not evidence.

 

[Max E.]

I would take the word of a woman who has been a sexual assault victim over a word of a man who is willing to take the right of every woman to have a choice cause he believes in some BS fairy tale any day.

Which woman who has been a "sexual assault victim" are you assuming is accurate?

Is it "Ford" where every single witness says it "Didnt happen" (where evidence DIRECTLY contradicted her.)

Is it Ramirez, where the story is so shoddy they chose not to print it.

Tell me where there is anything other than "He said/She said" from 35 years ago.

If you want to run with that then maybe you are a rapist...... infact i kind of remember in 2000 when "YOU RAPED ME".........It happened 25 years ago.....

Now its up to you to prove me wrong. I made the accusation, prove me wrong.

 

[constitutionman]

Where has this been established? Accusations are not evidence.

I said "A word". to put it simply, I meant Kavanagh is full of shit.

 

[constitutionman]

Which woman who has been a "sexual assault victim" are you assuming is accurate?

Is it "Ford" where every single witness says it "Didnt happen" (where evidence DIRECTLY contradicted her.)

Is it Ramirez, where the story is so shoddy they chose not to print it.

Tell me where there is anything other than "He said/She said" from 35 years ago.

If you want to run with that then maybe you are a rapist...... infact i kind of remember in 2000 when "YOU RAPED ME".........It happened 25 years ago.....

Now its up to you to prove me wrong. I made the accusation, prove me wrong.

As you said it, it's a "he said/she said" and I am siding with what she said. FBI investigation can shed some light on the matter, don't you think?

 

[Max E.]

I said "A word". to put it simply, I meant Kavanagh is full of shit.

You cant prove a negative, the fact you dont understand that, proves you are not a TRADER.

But it also proves you are not a human being, i could accuse you of being a "Dinosaur" if i wanted too..... how is that any less credible than a democratic operative accusing someone of rape 35 years later.

 

[Wallet]

You cant prove a negative, the fact you dont understand that proves you are not a TRADER. but it also proves you are not a human being, i could accuse you of being a "Dinosaur" if i wanted too..... how is that any more credible than a democratic operative accusing someone of rape 35 years later.

Just so you know, you're debating one of the village idiots.

 

[Max E.]

As you said it, it's a "he said/she said" and I am siding with what she said. FBI investigation can shed some light on the matter, don't you think?

Siding with it based on what evidence? There is not a single piece of evidence against him, infact, the story was so bad the New York times wasnt willing to post the same piece the New Yorker posted.

 

[Max E.]

For almost a thousand years we(the civilised world) have operated on a presumption of innocence, democrats literally want to go back to the Salem Witch trials, or the pre-civil rights era, where we can just lynch somebody, because someone threw out an accusation.

This shit is sickening... it wont end well.