It matters when I get paid based on a higher IV as compared to the risk I realize.
This is a terrible way to analyze risk. I hope some of the readers of this thread are learning from this.
It matters when I get paid based on a higher IV as compared to the risk I realize.
The skew didn't exist prior to '87 right? Or am I getting that confused?
I would agree 100% as I mention risk aversion a few posts up.
This is a terrible way to analyze risk. I hope some of the readers of this thread are learning from this.
I'm selling protection at a price higher than the realized cost of providing that protection over the long-term. This doesn't sound like a terrible risk proposition to me.
Such wow, amazing! I guess we should all just start doing that because there's no embedded risk whatsoever and the markets love handing out free money to those willing to get aboard such a no brainer bet?
I'm selling protection at a price higher than the realized cost of providing that protection over the long-term. This doesn't sound like a terrible risk proposition to me.
Ok. Scratch price/cost and replace with vol. Just trying to say things in a different way vs repeating over and over that IV > HV. But it doesn't matter. We clearly have different trading personalities and one has to stay within their personality in this business.