I guess I should just be happy that people are generally adverse to selling premium.
They are not. VX futures currently has a record short interest. The entire world is short vol.
I guess I should just be happy that people are generally adverse to selling premium.
Agreed. The present day cost of protection from future fear is overpriced. If there were no risk, everyone would be doing it. Some of us are willing to assume the risk, while others like to criticize us.I guess I should just be happy that people are generally adverse to selling premium.
Agreed. The present day cost of protection from future fear is overpriced. If there were no risk, everyone would be doing it. Some of us are willing to assume the risk, while others like to criticize us.
Financial planning and counseling.This is also false. And everyone is doing it. Bobby, you said you were in grad school. May I ask what you are studying?
They are not. VX futures currently has a record short interest. The entire world is short vol.
Short interest in futures?
Hmm, I get where everyone is going to. I understand that if IV>HV it seems a correct strategy to sell vol... But as @Maverick74 says... it's that way for a reason.
In my opinion it's the same why equity usually trades rich if compared to bookvalue/earnings/etc. It's upside vs downside.
Upside in selling vol is capture the premium, which is what... straddles are about 3.5% of underlying value.. (ES). So, any move beyond that is the downside... which have bigger tails.
So in that sense, IV>HV because of tail risk...
No, that is not correct either. It has to do with statistics. Implied volatility is representing an expected value of a distribution of prices. Realized vol is "one particular path". The "realized vol" is one version of the past. It happened to be the color of the marble drawn from the urn. But in reality there are many possible distributions. A trader is not betting on "one outcome" but rather the expected value of ALL the outcomes.