14 Completely Insane Reactions To Brett Kavanaugh’s Confirmation
http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/06...kavanaughs-confirmation/#.W7ol8PQYCdp.twitter
http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/06...kavanaughs-confirmation/#.W7ol8PQYCdp.twitter
Justice Kavanaugh confirmed
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
Yup, and as discussed, the lefties will try to destroy her. Being a woman means that she is a traitor and must be destroyed.
Barrett is a hard-core catholic, like Kavanaugh. Even moreso because she went to a catholic university, Notre Dame, and then taught there too. She is not a kerry, biden, ted kennedy type of cafeteria catholic. And neither was Scalia. And who did Barrett clerk for. Oh that's right. Scalia. As I said: traitor.
The lefties have not caught her saying she wants the repeal of Roe but they know she hates it, and the fact that she has five kids makes them think that she might not use abortion as a birth control method. And in addition she has adopted two or three kids from Haiti, which is something that only white colonial supremacists types do.
The left sees her coming, and they are already triggered. Thus confirming that she would be right for the job.
Because she is a woman, I am pretty sure the dems will argue that she must be listened to and treated respectfully though. Yeh, I just made a little joke there.
Last edited:
But that's not the picture is it?
If you see it the exact opposite its because you’re not being objective.
Here’s what I will say, get ready for the bust that comes from Republican management of the government. Add to that the social strife that will result from the culture war republican politians are campaigning on and it will not be pretty when all of this comes crashing down.
"Culture war" You mean between those who want an American culture and those who want a Venezuelan culture?
As I said earlier, there will be major blood on the floor before the 2020 election is over and most of it will be a result of the civil war in the Dem Party. So you might want to bury the dead from that conflict first before blaming everything on the barbarian republicans.
I like how the "new republic" article starts out "If Republicans refuse to let the other party govern..." what a load of shite. Democrats would be doing the exact same thing if the situation was reversed. In fact, they did the exact same thing under Obama with Obamacare.
Why can't it be you who isn't being objective? Why is it me who is the problem because I don't agree with you?
To think, had they not ran around in a state of hysteria screaming about rape clubs, gangbangs, alcoholism, yearbook musings, and throwing ice they probably would have been able to achieve their goal. All they had to do was stick with Ford and her story, full of holes as it was, and five will get you ten that Flake, Collins and maybe a couple others would have voted no. Bot noooo, they had to bring out Avenatti and his nonsense and by the time the left figured out that they had once again gone waaaaaaaay too far, the tide had shifted. The party of intellectuals should start trying to figure out how to keep their emotions in check. Yeah, I know, tough to do where you're mentally unbalanced to begin with.
Murum aires atigit.
These are all good questions but our government can easily be evaluated on fiscal soundness and leaders on their actions. The metrics for evaluating our government is not that different from evaluating a publicly traded company.
We can start by asking ourselves how sound is the short, medium and long term prospects of our country under the current leadership and take it from there.
In the short term, a year or so, I’d say pretty good. Thereafter, we are heading for trouble.