Well, that's one way of looking at it. The other way would be that anyone who is willing to "make a deal with the most intransigent, hardline, unreasonable, totalitarian mullahs in the world"...I'd say that person IS the problem.
What kind of idiot would get their political commentary from Stewart? He's a comedian. Often a clever even sometimes funny comedian. But just a comedian nonetheless.View attachment 146366
Well, that's one way of looking at it. The other way would be that anyone who is willing to "make a deal with the most intransigent, hardline, unreasonable, totalitarian mullahs in the world"...I'd say that person IS the problem.
Sending love letters is not making a deal.View attachment 146366
Well, that's one way of looking at it. The other way would be that anyone who is willing to "make a deal with the most intransigent, hardline, unreasonable, totalitarian mullahs in the world"...I'd say that person IS the problem.
Sending love letters is not making a deal.
Unless bending over is your idea of a deal.
ABOThe alternative being what?
Iran.
What we fail to understand is that Iran is going to produce nuclear weapons regardless and probably supply them to surrogate groups (terrorists).
What they fail to understand is how the west would react to a terrorist nuclear event once we traced the resultant waste isotope signature to their fuel production process.
WWIII?